Bug 170213 - make static HTML files into page.cgi pages. This does votehelp.html (-> id=voting.html), bug_status.html (-> id=fields.html) and bugwritinghelp.html (-> id=bug-writing.html). Patch by gerv; r=kiko, a=justdave.

author: gerv%gerv.net <> 2004-03-08 09:15:49 +0100
committer: gerv%gerv.net <> 2004-03-08 09:15:49 +0100
commit: f937a800633b5caed92dab8ad90568506b471b0d (patch)
tree: 6f9b674c5b4da8fb519403353d886c072020c51a
parent: 317a88ea11f43acc511d386c65f57bbc57a93c05 (diff)
download: bugzilla-f937a800633b5caed92dab8ad90568506b471b0d.tar.gz
bugzilla-f937a800633b5caed92dab8ad90568506b471b0d.tar.xz
3 files changed, 0 insertions, 683 deletions
diff --git a/bug_status.html b/bug_status.html
deleted file mode 100755
index 3ac554509..000000000
--- a/bug_status.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,208 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
-<HTML>
-
-<!--
-     The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public
-     License Version 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file
-     except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of
-     the License at http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/
-    
-     Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS
-     IS" basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or
-     implied. See the License for the specific language governing
-     rights and limitations under the License.
-    
-     The Original Code is the Bugzilla Bug Tracking System.
-    
-     The Initial Developer of the Original Code is Netscape Communications
-     Corporation. Portions created by Netscape are
-     Copyright (C) 1998 Netscape Communications Corporation. All
-     Rights Reserved.
-    
-     Contributor(s): 
-
-     Contributor(s): Terry Weissman <terry@mozilla.org>
--->
-
-<head>
-<TITLE>A Bug's Life Cycle</TITLE>
-<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
-</head>
-<body>
-
-<h1 ALIGN=CENTER>A Bug's Life Cycle</h1>
-
-The <B>status</B> and <B>resolution</B> field define and track the
-life cycle of a bug.
-
-<a name="status"></a>
-<p>
-<TABLE BORDER=1 CELLPADDING=4>
-
-<TR ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=TOP>
-<TD WIDTH="50%"><H1>STATUS</H1> <TD><H1>RESOLUTION</H1>
-
-<TR VALIGN=TOP>
-<TD>The <B>status</B> field indicates the general health of a bug. Only
-certain status transitions are allowed.
-<TD>The <b>resolution</b> field indicates what happened to this bug.
-
-<TR VALIGN=TOP><TD>
-<DL><DT><B>UNCONFIRMED</B> 
-<DD> This bug has recently been added to the database.  Nobody has
-     validated that this bug is true.  Users who have the "canconfirm"
-     permission set may confirm this bug, changing its state to NEW.
-     Or, it may be directly resolved and marked RESOLVED.
-<DT><B>NEW</B> 
-<DD> This bug has recently been added to the assignee's list of bugs
-     and must be processed. Bugs in this state may be accepted, and
-     become <B>ASSIGNED</B>, passed on to someone else, and remain
-     <B>NEW</B>, or resolved and marked <B>RESOLVED</B>.
-<DT><B>ASSIGNED</B> 
-<DD> This bug is not yet resolved, but is assigned to the proper
-     person. From here bugs can be given to another person and become
-     <B>NEW</B>, or resolved and become <B>RESOLVED</B>.
-<DT><B>REOPENED</B>
-<DD>This bug was once resolved, but the resolution was deemed
-     incorrect.  For example, a <B>WORKSFORME</B> bug is
-     <B>REOPENED</B> when more information shows up and the bug is now
-     reproducible.  From here bugs are either marked <B>ASSIGNED</B>
-     or <B>RESOLVED</B>.
-</DL>
-<TD>
-<DL>
-<DD> No resolution yet. All bugs which are in one of these "open" states
-     have the resolution set to blank. All other bugs
-     will be marked with one of the following resolutions.
-</DL>
-
-<TR VALIGN=TOP><TD>
-<DL>
-<DT><B>RESOLVED</B> 
-<DD> A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by
-     QA. From here bugs are either re-opened and become
-     <B>REOPENED</B>, are marked <B>VERIFIED</B>, or are closed for good
-     and marked <B>CLOSED</B>.
-<DT><B>VERIFIED</B>
-<DD> QA has looked at the bug and the resolution and agrees that the
-     appropriate resolution has been taken.  Bugs remain in this state
-     until the product they were reported against actually ships, at
-     which point they become <B>CLOSED</B>.
-<DT><B>CLOSED</B> 
-<DD> The bug is considered dead, the resolution is correct. Any zombie
-     bugs who choose to walk the earth again must do so by becoming
-     <B>REOPENED</B>.
-</DL>
-
-<TD>
-<DL>
-<DT><B>FIXED</B>
-<DD> A fix for this bug is checked into the tree and tested.
-<DT><B>INVALID</B>
-<DD> The problem described is not a bug 
-<DT><B>WONTFIX</B>
-<DD> The problem described is a bug which will never be fixed.
-<DT><B>LATER</B>
-<DD> The problem described is a bug which will not be fixed in this
-     version of the product.
-<DT><B>REMIND</B>
-<DD> The problem described is a bug which will probably not be fixed in this
-     version of the product, but might still be.
-<DT><B>DUPLICATE</B>
-<DD> The problem is a duplicate of an existing bug. Marking a bug
-     duplicate requires the bug# of the duplicating bug and will at
-     least put that bug number in the description field.
-<DT><B>WORKSFORME</B>
-<DD> All attempts at reproducing this bug were futile, reading the
-     code produces no clues as to why this behavior would occur. If
-     more information appears later, please re-assign the bug, for
-     now, file it.
-<DT><B>MOVED</B>
-<DD> The problem was specific to a related product whose bugs are tracked in
-     another bug database. The bug has been moved to that database.
-</DL>
-</TABLE>
-
-<H1>Other Fields</H1>
-
-<table border=1 cellpadding=4><tr><td>
-<h2><a name="severity">Severity</a></h2>
-
-This field describes the impact of a bug.
-
-<p>
-<p>
- 
-<table>
-<tr><th>Blocker</th><td>Blocks development and/or testing work
-<tr><th>Critical</th><td>crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak 
-<tr><th>Major</th><td>major loss of function 
-<tr><th>Minor</th><td>minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present 
-<tr><th>Trivial</th><td>cosmetic problem like misspelled words or misaligned text 
-<tr><th>Enhancement</th><td>Request for enhancement
-</table> 
-
-</td><td>
-
-<h2><a name="priority">Priority</a></h2>
-
-This field describes the importance and order in which a bug should be
-fixed.  This field is utilized by the programmers/engineers to
-prioritize their work to be done.  The available priorities are:
-
-<p>
-<p>
-
-<table>
-<tr><th>P1</th><td>Most important
-<tr><th>P2</th><td>
-<tr><th>P3</th><td>
-<tr><th>P4</th><td>
-<tr><th>P5</th><td>Least important
-</table>
-</tr></table>
-
-<h2><a name="rep_platform">Platform</a></h2>
-This is the hardware platform against which the bug was reported.  Legal
-platforms include:
-
-<UL>
-<LI> All (happens on all platforms; cross-platform bug)
-<LI> Macintosh
-<LI> PC
-<LI> Sun
-<LI> HP
-</UL>
-
-<b>Note:</b> Selecting the option "All" does not select bugs assigned against all platforms.  It
-merely selects bugs that <b>occur</b> on all platforms.
-
-<h2><a name="op_sys">Operating System</a></h2>
-This is the operating system against which the bug was reported.  Legal
-operating systems include:
-
-<UL>
-<LI> All (happens on all operating systems; cross-platform bug)
-<LI> Windows 95
-<LI> Mac System 8.0
-<LI> Linux
-</UL>
-
-Note that the operating system implies the platform, but not always.
-For example, Linux can run on PC and Macintosh and others.
-
-<h2><a name="assigned_to">Assigned To</a></h2>
-
-This is the person in charge of resolving the bug.  Every time this
-field changes, the status changes to <B>NEW</B> to make it easy to see
-which new bugs have appeared on a person's list.
-
-The default status for queries is set to NEW, ASSIGNED and REOPENED. When
-searching for bugs that have been resolved or verified, remember to set the
-status field appropriately. 
-
-<hr>
-<!-- hhmts start -->
-Last modified: Sun Apr 14 12:51:23 EST 2002
-<!-- hhmts end -->
-</body> </html>
diff --git a/bugwritinghelp.html b/bugwritinghelp.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 46bddcb24..000000000
--- a/bugwritinghelp.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,392 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
-<html>
-<head>
-<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
-<title>Bug Writing Guidelines</title>
-</head>
-<body>
-<center>
-<h1>Bug Writing Guidelines</h1>
-</center>
-
-<h3>Why You Should Read This</h3>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p>Simply put, the more effectively you report a bug, the more
-likely an engineer will actually fix it.</p>
-
-<p>These guidelines are a general
-tutorial to teach novice and intermediate bug reporters how to compose effective bug reports. Not every sentence may precisely apply to
-your software project.</p>
-</blockquote>
-
-<h3>How to Write a Useful Bug Report</h3>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p>Useful bug reports are ones that get bugs fixed. A useful bug
-report normally has two qualities:</p>
-
-<ol>
-<li><b>Reproducible.</b> If an engineer can't see the bug herself to prove that it exists, she'll probably stamp your bug report "WORKSFORME" or "INVALID" and move on to the next bug. Every detail you can provide helps.<br>
-<br>
-</li>
-
-<li><b>Specific.</b> The quicker the engineer can isolate the bug
-to a specific area, the more likely she'll expediently fix it. 
-(If a programmer or tester has to decypher a bug, they may spend
-more time cursing the submitter than solving the problem.)
-<br>
-<br>
-[ <a href="#tips" name="Anchor">Tell Me More</a> ]
-</li>
-</ol>
-
-<p>Let's say the application you're testing is a web browser. You
-crash at foo.com, and want to write up a bug report:</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p><b>BAD:</b> "My browser crashed. I think I was on www.foo.com. I play golf with Bill Gates, so you better fix this problem, or I'll report you to him. By the way, your Back icon looks like a squashed rodent. UGGGLY. And my grandmother's home page is all messed up in your browser. Thx 4 UR help."
-</p>
-
-<p>
- <b>GOOD:</b> "I crashed each time I went to www.foo.com, using
-the 2002-02-25 build on a Windows 2000 system. I also
-rebooted into Linux, and reproduced this problem using the 2002-02-24
-Linux build.
-</p>
-
-<p>
- It again crashed each time upon drawing the Foo banner at the top
-of the page. I broke apart the page, and discovered that the
-following image link will crash the application reproducibly,
-unless you remove the "border=0" attribute:
-</p>
-
-<p>
- <tt>&lt;IMG SRC="http://www.foo.com/images/topics/topicfoos.gif"
-width="34" height="44" border="0" alt="News"&gt;</tt>
-</p>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-
-<h3>How to Enter your Useful Bug Report into Bugzilla:</h3>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p>Before you enter your bug, use Bugzilla's 
-<a href="query.cgi">search page</a> to determine whether the defect you've discovered is a known, already-reported bug. If your bug is the 37th duplicate of a known issue, you're more likely to annoy the engineer. (Annoyed
-engineers fix fewer bugs.)
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Next, be sure to reproduce your bug using a recent
-build. Engineers tend to be most interested in problems affecting
-the code base that they're actively working on. After all, the bug you're reporting
-may already be fixed.
-
-</p>
-
-<p>
- If you've discovered a new bug using a current build, report it in
-Bugzilla:
-</p>
-
-<ol>
-<li>From your Bugzilla main page, choose 
-"<a href="enter_bug.cgi">Enter a new bug</a>".</li>
-
-<li>Select the product that you've found a bug in.</li>
-
-<li>Enter your e-mail address, password, and press the "Login"
-button. (If you don't yet have a password, leave the password field empty, 
-and press the "E-mail me a password" button instead.
-You'll quickly receive an e-mail message with your password.)</li>
-</ol>
-
-<p>Now, fill out the form. Here's what it all means:</p>
-
-<p><b>Where did you find the bug?</b></p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p><b>Product: In which product did you find the bug?</b><br>
- You just specified this on the last page, so you can't edit it here.</p>
-
-<p><b>Version: In which product version did you find the
-bug?</b><br>
- (If applicable)</p>
-
-<p><b>Component: In which component does the bug exist?</b><br>
-Bugzilla requires that you select a component to enter a bug. (Not sure which to choose? 
-Click on the Component link. You'll see a description of each component, to help you make the best choice.)</p>
-
-<p><b>OS: On which Operating System (OS) did you find this bug?</b>
-(e.g. Linux, Windows 2000, Mac OS 9.)<br>
- If you know the bug happens on all OSs, choose 'All'. Otherwise,
-select the OS that you found the bug on, or "Other" if your OS
-isn't listed.</p>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>How important is the bug?</b></p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p><b>Severity: How damaging is the bug?</b><br>
- This item defaults to 'normal'. If you're not sure what severity your bug deserves, click on the Severity link.
- You'll see a description of each severity rating. <br>
-</p>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>Who will be following up on the bug?</b></p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p><b>Assigned To: Which engineer should be responsible for fixing
-this bug?</b><br>
- Bugzilla will automatically assign the bug to a default engineer
-upon submitting a bug report. If you'd prefer to directly assign the bug to
-someone else, enter their e-mail address into this field. (To see the list of
-default engineers for each component, click on the Component
-link.)</p>
-
-<p><b>Cc: Who else should receive e-mail updates on changes to this
-bug?</b><br>
- List the full e-mail addresses of other individuals who should
-receive an e-mail update upon every change to the bug report. You
-can enter as many e-mail addresses as you'd like, separated by spaces or commas, as long as those
-people have Bugzilla accounts.</p>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>What else can you tell the engineer about the bug?</b></p>
-
-<blockquote>
-
-<p><b>Summary:</b> <b>How would you describe the bug, in
-approximately 60 or fewer characters?</b><br>
- A good summary should <b>quickly and uniquely identify a bug
-report</b>. Otherwise, an engineer cannot meaningfully identify
-your bug by its summary, and will often fail to pay attention to
-your bug report when skimming through a 10 page bug list.<br>
-<br>
- A useful summary might be 
- "<tt>PCMCIA install fails on Tosh Tecra 780DVD w/ 3c589C</tt>". 
- "<tt>Software fails</tt>" or "<tt>install problem</tt>" would be
-examples of a bad summary.<br>
-<br>
- [ <a href="#summary">Tell Me More</a> ]<br>
-<br>
- <b>Description: </b><br>
- Please provide a detailed problem report in this field.
-Your bug's recipients will most likely expect the following information:</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p><b>Overview Description:</b> More detailed expansion of
-summary.</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<pre>
-Drag-selecting any page crashes Mac builds in NSGetFactory
-</pre>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>Steps to Reproduce:</b> Minimized, easy-to-follow steps that will
-trigger the bug. Include any special setup steps.</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<pre>
-1) View any web page. (I used the default sample page,
-resource:/res/samples/test0.html)
-                          
-2) Drag-select the page. (Specifically, while holding down 
-the mouse button, drag the mouse pointer downwards from any 
-point in the browser's content region to the bottom of the 
-browser's content region.)                   
-</pre>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p>
- <b>Actual Results:</b> What the application did after performing
-the above steps. 
-</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<pre>
-The application crashed. Stack crawl appended below from MacsBug.
-</pre>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>Expected Results:</b> What the application should have done,
-were the bug not present.</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<pre>
-The window should scroll downwards. Scrolled content should be selected. 
-(Or, at least, the application should not crash.)
-</pre>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>Build Date &amp; Platform:</b> Date and platform of the build
-that you first encountered the bug in.</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<pre>
-Build 2002-03-15 on Mac OS 9.0
-</pre>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>Additional Builds and Platforms:</b> Whether or not the bug
-takes place on other platforms (or browsers, if applicable).</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<pre>
-- Also Occurs On        
-    Mozilla (2002-03-15 build on Windows NT 4.0) 
-                                    
-- Doesn't Occur On        
-    Mozilla (2002-03-15 build on Red Hat Linux; feature not supported)        
-    Internet Explorer 5.0 (shipping build on Windows NT 4.0)        
-    Netscape Communicator 4.5 (shipping build on Mac OS 9.0)
-</pre>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b>Additional Information:</b> Any other debugging information.
-For crashing bugs:</p>
-
-<ul>
-<li><b>Win32:</b> if you receive a Dr. Watson error, please note
-the type of the crash, and the module that the application crashed
-in. (e.g. access violation in apprunner.exe)</li>
-
-<li><b>Mac OS:</b> if you're running MacsBug, please provide the
-results of a <b>how</b> and an <b>sc</b>:</li>
-</ul>
-
-<blockquote>
-<pre>
-*** MACSBUG STACK CRAWL OF CRASH (Mac OS)
-Calling chain using A6/R1 links 
-    Back chain  ISA  Caller 
-    00000000    PPC  0BA85E74   
-    03AEFD80    PPC  0B742248   
-    03AEFD30    PPC  0B50FDDC  NSGetFactory+027FC
-PowerPC unmapped memory exception at 0B512BD0 NSGetFactory+055F0
-</pre>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p>You're done!<br>
-<br>
- After double-checking your entries for any possible errors, press
-the "Commit" button, and your bug report will now be in the
-Bugzilla database.<br>
-</p>
-</blockquote>
-
-<hr>
-<h3>More Information on Writing Good Bugs</h3>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p><b><a name="tips"></a> 1. General Tips for a Useful Bug
-Report</b>
-</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p>
- <b>Use an explicit structure, so your bug reports are easy to
-skim.</b> Bug report users often need immediate access to specific
-sections of your bug. If your Bugzilla installation supports the
-Bugzilla Helper, use it.
-</p>
-
-<p>
- <b>Avoid cuteness if it costs clarity.</b> Nobody will be laughing
-at your funny bug title at 3:00 AM when they can't remember how to
-find your bug.
-</p>
-
-<p>
- <b>One bug per report.</b> Completely different people typically
-fix, verify, and prioritize different bugs. If you mix a handful of
-bugs into a single report, the right people probably won't discover
-your bugs in a timely fashion, or at all. Certain bugs are also
-more important than others. It's impossible to prioritize a bug
-report when it contains four different issues, all of differing
-importance.
-</p>
-
-<p>
- <b>No bug is too trivial to report.</b> Unless you're reading the
-source code, you can't see actual software bugs, like a dangling
-pointer -- you'll see their visible manifestations, such as the
-segfault when the application finally crashes. Severe software
-problems can manifest themselves in superficially trivial ways.
-File them anyway.<br>
-</p>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p><b><a name="summary"></a>2. How and Why to Write Good Bug Summaries</b>
-</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-<p><b>You want to make a good first impression on the bug
-recipient.</b> Just like a New York Times headline guides readers
-towards a relevant article from dozens of choices, will your bug summary
-suggest that your bug report is worth reading from dozens or hundreds of
-choices?
-</p>
-
-<p>
- Conversely, a vague bug summary like <tt>install problem</tt> forces anyone
-reviewing installation bugs to waste time opening up your bug to
-determine whether it matters.
-</p>
-
-<p>
- <b>Your bug will often be searched by its summary.</b> Just as
-you'd find web pages with Google by searching by keywords through
-intuition, so will other people locate your bugs. Descriptive bug
-summaries are naturally keyword-rich, and easier to find.
-</p>
-
-<p>
- For example, you'll find a bug titled "<tt>Dragging icons from List View to
-gnome-terminal doesn't paste path</tt>" if you search on "List",
-"terminal", or "path". Those search keywords wouldn't have found a
-bug titled "<tt>Dragging icons
-doesn't paste</tt>".
-</p>
-
-<p>
- Ask yourself, "Would someone understand my bug from just this
-summary?" If so, you've written a fine summary.
-</p>
-
-<p><b>Don't write titles like these:</b></p>
-
-<ol>
- <li>"Can't install" - Why can't you install? What happens when you
-try to install?</li>
-<li>"Severe Performance Problems" - ...and they occur when you do
-what?</li>
-<li>"back button does not work" - Ever? At all?</li>
-</ol>
-
-<p><b>Good bug titles:</b></p>
-<ol>
-<li>"1.0 upgrade installation fails if Mozilla M18 package present"
-- Explains problem and the context.</li>
-<li>"RPM 4 installer crashes if launched on Red Hat 6.2 (RPM 3)
-system" - Explains what happens, and the context.</li>
-</ol>
-
-
-
-</blockquote>
-</blockquote>
-
-<p>(Written and maintained by 
-<a href="http://www.prometheus-music.com/eli">Eli Goldberg</a>. Claudius
-Gayle, Gervase Markham, Peter Mock, Chris Pratt, Tom Schutter and Chris Yeh also
-contributed significant changes. Constructive 
-<a href="mailto:eli@prometheus-music.com">suggestions</a> welcome.)</p>
-
-</body>
-</html>
-
diff --git a/votehelp.html b/votehelp.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 5d49d469f..000000000
--- a/votehelp.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
-<html>
-<!--
-     The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public
-     License Version 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file
-     except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of
-     the License at http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/
-    
-     Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS
-     IS" basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or
-     implied. See the License for the specific language governing
-     rights and limitations under the License.
-    
-     The Original Code is the Bugzilla Bug Tracking System.
-    
-     The Initial Developer of the Original Code is Netscape Communications
-     Corporation. Portions created by Netscape are
-     Copyright (C) 1998 Netscape Communications Corporation. All
-     Rights Reserved.
-    
-     Contributor(s): 
-
-     Contributor(s): Terry Weissman <terry@mozilla.org>
--->
-<head>
-<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
-<title>Bugzilla Voting</title>
-</head>
-
-<body>
-<h1>Bugzilla Voting</h1>
-
-<p>
-Bugzilla has a "voting" feature.  Each product allows users to have a
-certain number of votes.  (Some products may not allow any, which
-means you can't vote on things in that product at all.) With your
-vote, you indicate which bugs you think are the most important to be
-fixed.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Depending on how the administrator has configured the relevant
-product, you may be able to vote for the same bug more than one time.
-But remember, you only have so many votes to use in total!  So, you
-can either vote a little for many bugs, or vote a lot for a few bugs.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-To look at votes:
-</p>
-
-<ul>
-  <li> Go to the query page.  Do a normal query, but enter 1 in the
-       "At least ___ votes" field.  This will show you items that
-       match your query that have at least one vote.</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>
-To vote for a bug:
-</p>
-
-<ul>
-  <li> Bring up the bug in question.</li>
-  <li> Click on the "Vote for this bug" link that appears just above
-       the "Additional Comments" field.  (If no such link appears,
-       then voting may not be allowed in this bug's product.)</li>
-  <li> Indicate how many votes you want to give this bug.  This page
-       also displays how many votes you've given to other bugs, so you
-       may rebalance your votes as necessary.</li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>
-You will automatically get email notifying you of any changes that
-occur on bugs you vote for.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-You may review your votes at any time by clicking on the "<a
-href="votes.cgi?action=show_user">My Votes</a>" link in
-the page footer.
-</p>
-</body>
-</html>
author	gerv%gerv.net <>	2004-03-08 09:15:49 +0100
committer	gerv%gerv.net <>	2004-03-08 09:15:49 +0100
commit	f937a800633b5caed92dab8ad90568506b471b0d (patch)
tree	6f9b674c5b4da8fb519403353d886c072020c51a
parent	317a88ea11f43acc511d386c65f57bbc57a93c05 (diff)
download	bugzilla-f937a800633b5caed92dab8ad90568506b471b0d.tar.gz bugzilla-f937a800633b5caed92dab8ad90568506b471b0d.tar.xz