diff options
author | mbarnson%sisna.com <> | 2008-04-04 13:46:12 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | mbarnson%sisna.com <> | 2008-04-04 13:46:12 +0200 |
commit | adc546d5f36c665ea0acc9d69827178da5bc2600 (patch) | |
tree | e330815396521f6b97476bbed3e405676388a54a /docs/en/xml | |
parent | aa7f3f31c61deaabbf53af785ebc57bcc6470986 (diff) | |
download | bugzilla-adc546d5f36c665ea0acc9d69827178da5bc2600.tar.gz bugzilla-adc546d5f36c665ea0acc9d69827178da5bc2600.tar.xz |
Added notes on using OpenLDAP;
We should probably look at code changes to make Net::LDAP our permanent
LDAP plugin rather than Mozilla::LDAP...
See bug 167379.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/en/xml')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/en/xml/installation.xml | 22 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/en/xml/installation.xml b/docs/en/xml/installation.xml index d2a111395..76b3eb87a 100644 --- a/docs/en/xml/installation.xml +++ b/docs/en/xml/installation.xml @@ -1093,6 +1093,28 @@ primary email address. On most directory servers available, this is "mail", but you may need to change this. </para> + + <para>You can also try using <ulink url="http://www.openldap.org/"> + OpenLDAP</ulink> with Bugzilla, using any of a number of administration + tools. You should apply the patch attached this bug: + <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158630"> + http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158630</ulink>, then set + the following object classes for your users: + + <orderedlist> + <listitem><para>objectClass: person</para></listitem> + <listitem><para>objectClass: organizationalPerson</para></listitem> + <listitem><para>objectClass: inetOrgPerson</para></listitem> + <listitem><para>objectClass: top</para></listitem> + <listitem><para>objectClass: posixAccount</para></listitem> + <listitem><para>objectClass: shadowAccount</para></listitem> + </orderedlist> + + Please note that this patch <emphasis>has not</emphasis> yet been + accepted by the Bugzilla team, and so you may need to do some + manual tweaking. That said, it looks like Net::LDAP is probably + the way to go in the future. + </para> </section> <section id="content-type" |