summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/t/Support/Templates.pm
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-02-29Bug 1136137: Require Perl 5.14Frédéric Buclin1-1/+1
r=dkl
2014-08-13Bug 996893: Perl 5.18 and newer throw tons of warnings about deprecated modulesFrédéric Buclin1-22/+13
r=dkl a=sgreen
2013-09-26Bug 893589 - 004template.t fails when templates in extension directorySimon Green1-4/+12
r=dkl, a=simon
2012-12-01Bug 787668: Use |use parent| instead of |use base|Matt Selsky1-1/+1
r/a=LpSolit
2012-01-11Bug 680131: Replace the MPL 1.1 license by the MPL 2.0 one in all files, and ↵Frédéric Buclin1-22/+5
add it to files which miss one r=kiko r=mkanat r=mrbball a=LpSolit
2011-08-31Bug 680729 - Testing suite (runtests.pl) incorrectly plans to do its ↵Marc Schumann1-4/+9
existence check on referenced templates more than once. r=dkl; a=mkanat
2011-06-23Bug 663835 - Extensions templates are not tested by the normal sanity test ↵David Lawrence1-24/+5
scripts r/a=mkanat
2006-07-05Bug 343566: Runtests test 004template.t fails on some systems with a ↵lpsolit%gmail.com1-0/+4
complaint about RELATIVE - Patch by Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit@gmail.com> r=joel a=myk
2005-08-06Bug 285700: bump minimum File::Spec version to 0.84 to deal with taint errorsjustdave%bugzilla.org1-1/+1
r= LpSolit, a= justdave
2004-01-12Fix for bug 229658: Implements a mechanism for extensions to hook into ↵myk%mozilla.org1-0/+2
standard Bugzilla templates so they can extend the Bugzilla UI without having to modify the standard templates themselves, making it easier to develop and use Bugzilla extensions. r=bbaetz, gerv a=myk
2003-01-24Bug 126955 - Bugzilla should support translated/localized templates. Patch ↵gerv%gerv.net1-9/+62
by burnus; r=gerv, a=justdave.
2002-08-27Updating my e-mail address as jake@acutex.net is no longer valid.jake%bugzilla.org1-1/+1
* NO CODE CHANGES *
2002-08-26Bug 76923 - Don't |use diagnostics| (its really expensive at startup time)bbaetz%student.usyd.edu.au1-1/+0
r=joel x2
2002-05-07Bug 135543 - @Support::Templates::testitems does not list all templatesbbaetz%student.usyd.edu.au1-9/+50
Patch by ddkilzer@theracingworld.com (David D. Kilzer), r=gerv, justdave
2002-04-24Fix tinderbox bustage caused by the template location code change. The ↵justdave%syndicomm.com1-1/+1
tests are now looking in the right place for the templates. 4 templates in the new location now come up with syntax errors however.
2002-03-12Bug 130254 - Template params don't have to exist, since they may bebbaetz%student.usyd.edu.au1-0/+3
subject to interpolation. Ignore names with $ in them as a workaround r=myk x 2
2001-12-01Get the file list of files to scan for templates from Support::Files instead ↵jake%acutex.net1-1/+3
of glob('*')
2001-11-14We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE ↵jake%acutex.net1-15/+0
%] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.
2001-10-20Bug 103664 - Tests should "use strict;" and not contain any tabs. We should ↵jake%acutex.net1-4/+4
also use the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable instead of VERBOSE. Patch by David D. Kilzer <ddkilzer@theracingworld.com> Additional edits by myself to add the emacs mode line. Also, the change to runtests.sh was done by me.
2001-10-10It's also possible to PROCESS another attachment fragment, not just INCLUDE.jake%acutex.net1-1/+1
No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD.
2001-10-07We also need to look for templates that are INCLUDEd in other templates.jake%acutex.net1-0/+17
No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD
2001-10-07Test that scans Bugzilla's code looking for used templates then checks to ↵jake%acutex.net1-0/+44
make sure that: a) All the required templates exist b) They all have good syntax No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD