From 82a6ee698f52595ce7ec43fabefd222a1f80892a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:02:15 +0100
Subject: Bug 727240: The POD for Bug.attachments is wrong about the format of
 the returned data r=dkl a=LpSolit

---
 Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm | 26 ++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

(limited to 'Bugzilla/WebService')

diff --git a/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm b/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm
index ea1becc0a..a8c7282ef 100644
--- a/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm
+++ b/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm
@@ -1274,19 +1274,14 @@ value looks like this:
 
  {
      bugs => {
-         1345 => {
-             attachments => [
-                 { (attachment) },
-                 { (attachment) }
-             ]
-         },
-         9874 => {
-             attachments => [
-                 { (attachment) },
-                 { (attachment) }
-             ]
-
-         },
+         1345 => [
+             { (attachment) },
+             { (attachment) }
+         ],
+         9874 => [
+             { (attachment) },
+             { (attachment) }
+         ],
      },
 
      attachments => {
@@ -1297,9 +1292,8 @@ value looks like this:
 
 The attachments of any bugs that you specified in the C<ids> argument in
 input are returned in C<bugs> on output. C<bugs> is a hash that has integer
-bug IDs for keys and contains a single key, C<attachments>. That key points
-to an arrayref that contains attachments as a hash. (Fields for attachments
-are described below.)
+bug IDs for keys and the values are arrayrefs that contain hashes as attachments.
+(Fields for attachments are described below.)
 
 For any attachments that you specified directly in C<attachment_ids>, they
 are returned in C<attachments> on output. This is a hash where the attachment
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-24-g4f1b


From 3d4edc9bd64bf54e5c8de528904a428d30503f3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Lawrence <dlawrence@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:59:08 -0500
Subject: Bug 724464 - JSON-RPC support shouldn't require SOAP::Lite
 r/a=LpSolit

---
 Bugzilla/WebService/Server/XMLRPC.pm | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

(limited to 'Bugzilla/WebService')

diff --git a/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/XMLRPC.pm b/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/XMLRPC.pm
index b74d0eebd..5c3677993 100644
--- a/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/XMLRPC.pm
+++ b/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/XMLRPC.pm
@@ -31,6 +31,20 @@ if ($ENV{MOD_PERL}) {
 
 use Bugzilla::WebService::Constants;
 
+# Allow WebService methods to call XMLRPC::Lite's type method directly
+BEGIN {
+    *Bugzilla::WebService::type = sub {
+        my ($self, $type, $value) = @_;
+        if ($type eq 'dateTime') {
+            # This is the XML-RPC implementation,  see the README in Bugzilla/WebService/.
+            # Our "base" implementation is in Bugzilla::WebService::Server.
+            $value = Bugzilla::WebService::Server->datetime_format_outbound($value);
+            $value =~ s/-//g;
+        }
+        return XMLRPC::Data->type($type)->value($value);
+    };
+}
+
 sub initialize {
     my $self = shift;
     my %retval = $self->SUPER::initialize(@_);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-24-g4f1b