From e9a32920f47ce268e3835b12abccc9fb2e1dd8c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "terry%mozilla.org" <> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:15:20 +0000 Subject: Major spankage. Added a new state, UNCONFIRMED. Added new groups, "editbugs" and "canconfirm". People without these states are now much more limited in what they can do. For backwards compatability, by default all users will have the editbugs and canconfirm bits on them. Installing this changes as is should only have one major visible effect -- an UNCONFIRMED state will appear in the query page. But no bugs will become in that state, until you tweak some of the new voting-related parameters you'll find when editing products. --- confirmhelp.html | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 154 insertions(+) create mode 100644 confirmhelp.html (limited to 'confirmhelp.html') diff --git a/confirmhelp.html b/confirmhelp.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5c8e64434 --- /dev/null +++ b/confirmhelp.html @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +
+ + + ++ +New bugs in some products will now show up in a new state, +UNCONFIRMED. This means that we have nobody has confirmed that the +bug is real. Very busy engineers will probably generally ignore +UNCONFIRMED that have been assigned to them, until they have been +confirmed in one way or another. (Engineers with more time will +hopefully glance over their UNCONFIRMED bugs regularly.) + +
+ +The page describing bug fields has been +updated to include UNCONFIRMED. +
+ +There are two basic ways that a bug can become confirmed (and enter +the NEW) state. + +
+ +If you have the "Can confirm a bug" permission, then you will be able +to move UNCONFIRMED bugs into the NEW state. + +
+ +If you have the "Can edit all aspects of any bug" permission, then you +can tweak anything about any bug. If not, you may only edit those +bugs that you have submitted, or that you have assigned to you (or +qa-assigned to you). However, anyone may add a comment to any bug. + +
+ +Some people (initially, the initial owners and initial qa-contacts for +components in the system) have the ability to give the above two +permissions to other people. So, if you really feel that you ought to +have one of these permissions, a good person to ask (via private +email, please!) is the person who is assigned a relevant bug. + +
+ + +People with one of the two bits above can easily confirm their own +bugs, so bugs they submit will actually start out in the NEW state. +They can override this when submitting a bug. + +
+ +People can ACCEPT or RESOLVE a bug assigned to them, even if they +aren't allowed to confirm it. However, the system remembers, and if +the bug gets REOPENED or reassigned to someone else, it will revert +back to the UNCONFIRMED state. If the bug has ever been confirmed, +then REOPENing or reassigning will cause it to go to the NEW or +REOPENED state. + +
+ +Note that only some products support the UNCONFIRMED state. In other +products, all new bugs will automatically start in the NEW state. + +
+ +If a person has submitted several bugs that get confirmed, then this +is probably a person who understands the system well, and deserves the +"Can confirm a bug" permission. This kind of person should be +detected and promoted automatically. + +
+ +There should also be a way to automatically promote people to get the +"Can edit all aspects of any bug" permission. + +
+ +The "enter a new bug" page needs to be revamped with easy ways for new +people to educate themselves on the benefit of searching for a bug +like the one they're about to submit and voting on it, rather than +adding a new useless duplicate. + +