1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
|
<HTML
><HEAD
><TITLE
>Description Flags and Tracking Bugs</TITLE
><META
NAME="GENERATOR"
CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.64
"><LINK
REL="HOME"
TITLE="The Bugzilla Guide"
HREF="index.html"><LINK
REL="UP"
TITLE="The Future of Bugzilla"
HREF="future.html"><LINK
REL="PREVIOUS"
TITLE="Better Searching"
HREF="searching.html"><LINK
REL="NEXT"
TITLE="Bug Issues"
HREF="bugprobs.html"></HEAD
><BODY
CLASS="SECTION"
BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"
TEXT="#000000"
LINK="#0000FF"
VLINK="#840084"
ALINK="#0000FF"
><DIV
CLASS="NAVHEADER"
><TABLE
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TH
COLSPAN="3"
ALIGN="center"
>The Bugzilla Guide</TH
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="searching.html"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="80%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="bottom"
>Chapter 6. The Future of Bugzilla</TD
><TD
WIDTH="10%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="bottom"
><A
HREF="bugprobs.html"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
></TABLE
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="SECTION"
><H1
CLASS="SECTION"
><A
NAME="TRACKINGBUGS"
>6.3. Description Flags and Tracking Bugs</A
></H1
><P
><P
CLASS="LITERALLAYOUT"
>Since I last posted on this issue, we now have "keywords" that solve<br>
many of the issues of description and status whiteboard keywords. We<br>
have seen a migration towards keywords, but there is still further to<br>
go.<br>
<br>
Description ( + Status Whiteboard ) Keywords<br>
--------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Some description keywords remain. I'd like to hear what reasons, other<br>
than time, there are for these staying as they are. I'm suspecting many<br>
are not really being used. Hopefully we can totally remove these<br>
eventually.<br>
<br>
Tracking Bugs<br>
-------------<br>
<br>
When I suggested keywords, I did so to get rid of tracking bugs too,<br>
though we've had less success on that front.<br>
<br>
There are many disadvantages to tracking bugs.<br>
<br>
- They can pollute bugs counts, and you must make sure you exclude<br>
them. I believe the meta keyword might be used for this purpose.<br>
- They have an assignee but there is nothing to fix, and that person can<br>
get whined at by Bugzilla.<br>
- It would be better to craft your own "dependency tree" rather than<br>
rely on a fixed hierachy in the bug system.<br>
- In creating a nice little hierachy, many bugs duplicate information<br>
that should be available in other ways, eg<br>
"http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12833" which is<br>
about beta 1 networking issues. These could fall behind the actual<br>
data. What tracking bugs are good for, ad hoc lists, is what keywords<br>
are better for.<br>
- An automatically generated dependency structure between one "tracking<br>
bug" and another would be better than a manual one, since it gives exact<br>
rather than manually set up classifications.<br>
<br>
Probably the only feature preventing tracking bugs being replaced is the<br>
dependency tree. The quintessential tracking bug seems to be bug #7229<br>
"chofmann's watch list", which probably has about a couple of hundred<br>
bugs at various levels, which allows a nice visualisation.<br>
<br>
Before keywords can replace tracking bugs better visualisation is going<br>
to be required. General summary reports and dependency forests of a bug<br>
list ("http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12992") could both<br>
help, but neither solves the problem totally. Perhaps keywords within<br>
keywords would help here. In any case, I'm still thinking about this<br>
one.<br>
<br>
Some tracking bugs could definitely be turned into keywords immediately<br>
though, and I'll point the finger at<br>
"http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7954" here since that's<br>
what came to mind first.</P
></P
></DIV
><DIV
CLASS="NAVFOOTER"
><HR
ALIGN="LEFT"
WIDTH="100%"><TABLE
WIDTH="100%"
BORDER="0"
CELLPADDING="0"
CELLSPACING="0"
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="searching.html"
>Prev</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="index.html"
>Home</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="bugprobs.html"
>Next</A
></TD
></TR
><TR
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="left"
VALIGN="top"
>Better Searching</TD
><TD
WIDTH="34%"
ALIGN="center"
VALIGN="top"
><A
HREF="future.html"
>Up</A
></TD
><TD
WIDTH="33%"
ALIGN="right"
VALIGN="top"
>Bug Issues</TD
></TR
></TABLE
></DIV
></BODY
></HTML
>
|
