summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net>2015-03-31 14:01:36 +0200
committerAndrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net>2015-03-31 14:01:36 +0200
commita8c499d0125b2e96f7f3c539f6b46cff7547aa80 (patch)
tree151c8869a8197ae1ab70039af5f796a39c1b9228 /user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst
parent914ae0404e8d699440e8468314a93b81f8cb87f6 (diff)
[ci skip] Update security recommendations
Diffstat (limited to 'user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst')
-rw-r--r--user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst12
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst b/user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst
index efc821f2b..fcfe4c24b 100644
--- a/user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst
+++ b/user_guide_src/source/general/security.rst
@@ -143,11 +143,15 @@ with that. Please read below.
feature, just randomly generate a new, one-time (this is also important)
password and send that instead.
-- DO NOT put artificial limits on your users' passwords.
+- DO NOT put unnecessary limits on your users' passwords.
- There's no point in forcing a rule that a password can only be up to
- a number of characters, or that it can't contain a certain set of
- special characters.
+ If you're using a hashing algorithm other than BCrypt (which has a limit
+ of 72 characters), you should set a relatively high limit on password
+ lengths in order to mitigate DoS attacks - say, 1024 characters.
+
+ Other than that however, there's no point in forcing a rule that a
+ password can only be up to a number of characters, or that it can't
+ contain a certain set of special characters.
Not only does this **reduce** security instead of improving it, but
there's literally no reason to do it. No technical limitations and