diff options
author | Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org> | 2009-04-11 19:38:20 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org> | 2009-04-11 19:38:20 +0200 |
commit | 6fb0c5abd7ac98694e9fb25749ed3b2e5b8c8848 (patch) | |
tree | ec3d0e5673ab855fababde63ab3286162fd0578e /doc/submitting-patches.txt | |
parent | 20ab91fb792644d8f32a525dd38ba02761d03c4c (diff) | |
download | pacman-6fb0c5abd7ac98694e9fb25749ed3b2e5b8c8848.tar.gz pacman-6fb0c5abd7ac98694e9fb25749ed3b2e5b8c8848.tar.xz |
doc: move files around for consistency
Move some of our documentation files, even though they aren't manpages, to
the doc/ directory. This allows the new 'html' make target to manage them.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/submitting-patches.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/submitting-patches.txt | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/submitting-patches.txt b/doc/submitting-patches.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e6853c5f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/submitting-patches.txt @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +Pacman - Submitting Patches +=========================== + +This document is here mainly to make the job of those who review patches +easier and is more of a guideline and not a strict set of rules. However, +please try to follow as much as you can. + +NOTE: Some of this is paraphrased from the kernel documentation's +"SubmittingPatches" file. + +Getting the most recent source +------------------------------ + +Patches need to be submitted in GIT format and are best if they are against the +latest version of the code. There are several helpful tutorials for getting +started with GIT if you have not worked with it before. + +* http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gittutorial.html +* http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Super_Quick_Git_Guide + +The pacman code can be fetched using the following command: + + git clone git://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git + + +Creating your patch +------------------- + +-- +* use `git commit -s` for creating a commit of your changes. + +The -s allows you to credit yourself by adding a "Signed Off By" line to +indicate who has "signed" the patch - who has approved it. + + Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaron@archlinux.org> + +Please use your real name and email address. Feel free to "scramble" the +address if you're afraid of spam. + +* Describe your patch. + +It helps if you describe the overview and goals of the patch in the git commit +log. This allows others to see what you intended so as to compare it to what +was actually done, and allows better feedback. + +* Use `git format-patch` to create patches. + +Your commit message will be shown above the patch by default when you will use +`git-format-patch`, including the signoff line. +-- + +Submitting your patch +--------------------- + +-- +* Send the patch to the pacman-dev mailing list + +The mailing list is the primary queue for review and acceptance. Here you +will get feedback, and let me know the details of your patch. + +* No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments. Just plain text. + +Patches should be contained in the actual body of the email. There are many +reasons for this. First, it makes them easier to read with any mail reader, +it allows easier review "at a glance", and most importantly, it allows people +to comment on exact lines of the patch in reply emails. + +`git send-email` allows you to send git formatted patches in plain text easily +and is the preferred method for submission to the mailing list. + +-- + +After you submit +---------------- + +-- +* Don't get discouraged + +Any feedback you get, positive or negative, has nothing to do with you. If a +patch is rejected, try taking the suggestions into account and re-submitting. +We welcome most submissions here, and some may take a bit longer to get +looked over than others. If you think your patch got lost in the shuffle, +send another email to the list in reply to the original asking if anyone has +looked at it yet. + +* Respond to feedback + +When you do get feedback, it usually merits a response, whether this be a +resubmit of the patch with corrections or a follow-up email asking for +clarifications. When neither of these occurs, don't expect your patch to see +further review. The all-volunteer staff don't have time to fix up patches that +aren't their own. + +-- + +///// +vim: set ts=2 sw=2 syntax=asciidoc et: +///// |