| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Since DUFLAGS and DUPATH are not needed anymore remove them from the
source
Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
MODECMD and OWNERCMD are not used by pacman itself, so we don't need to
check for and replace them now that pacman-optimize is removed.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Instead of assuming all scripts are .sh.in and leaving a comment to that
effect, just take the input file directly.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work
out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give
up on autotools.
Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my
machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under
half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation.
Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build:
meson build
Then, compile the project:
ninja -C build
There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and
autotools. specifically:
1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual
update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make
this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all
update-po targets and runs them.
2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a
suitable tarball for distribution.
|
