| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
A few parameters were outdated and this produced warnings from Doxygen
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
A few parameters were outdated or wrongly named, and a few things were
explicitly linked that Doxygen wasn't able to resolve.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
From http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/config.html#cfg_javadoc_autobrief
JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF
If the JAVADOC_AUTOBRIEF is set to YES then doxygen will interpret the
first line (until the first dot) of a JavaDoc-style comment as the brief
description. If set to NO (the default), the Javadoc-style will behave just
like regular Qt-style comments (thus requiring an explicit @brief command
for a brief description.)
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We had way too much going on with the Doxygen manpage generation. Clean it
up quite a bit by removing directory manpages, using relative paths, not
having a manpage for every single alpm function, and ensuring internal
functions are not documented publicly.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Instead of doing the doxygen work in the libalpm/ dir, do it with the rest
of the docs in the doc/ dir.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
