Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
It is now possible to invert patterns in NoExtract and NoUpgrade.
This feature allows users to whitelist certain files that were
previously blacklisted by another entry.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
On upgrades, indirect dependencies were not being detected if there was
a dependency in between them that was not part of the transaction. For
example, with the dependency chain: pkg1 -> pkg2 -> pkg3, if pkg1 and
pkg3 are being upgraded but not pkg2 pacman would not order pkg1 and
pkg3 properly.
This was particularly problematic when replacements were involved
because the replaced package(s) would be removed at the start of the
transaction. If an install script required the replacer and lacked
a direct dependency, it could fail.
Fixes FS#32764.
Partially fixes FS#23011.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Fixes FS#35515.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Currently we make no effort to validate the %FILENAME% field in the
repo db. This allows for relative paths to be considered valid.
A carefully crafted db entry with a malicious relative path,
(e.g. `../../../../etc/passwd`) will cause pacman to to
overwrite _any_ file on the target's machine.
Add the following validation:
- doesn't start with '.'
- doesn't contain a '/'
- won't overflow PATH_MAX
Signed-off-by: Simon Gomizelj <simongmzlj@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Packages removed due to conflicts are always removed at the beginning of
the transaction and as such can be included in the check for whether all
owners of a directory will be removed in a transaction. Installed
versions of packages being upgraded, other than the one with the
conflict, cannot be used because our transaction ordering is not
intelligent enough to ensure that they are removed prior to the
installation of the conflicted package.
Also, return false from dir_belongsto_pkgs on errors. Previously, we
simply continued which could return true even if we were unable to
actually establish that the package owned the entire tree.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We always want to work with the package file itself, not its target if
it's a symlink.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
After the initial checks, we either use the path as a directory and have
to append the trailing slash anyway or use it as a file in which case
the trailing slash should be excluded.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
When attempting to install a package (either via -S or -U) and the
signature is missing, the current error message "invalid or corrupted
package (PGP signature)" is very unclear. Instead inform the user
that the package is missing the required signature.
Partial fix for FS#34741.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
The previous implementation was overly complex with unnecessary checks
and nested conditionals. By reordering the tests and changing them to
all be checks for positive hash matches rather than non-matches, we can
collapse several cases and make the process much more linear. This
removes the need to set hash_orig = "" just to reach some of the checks
and corrects a faulty assumption that files are equivalent when the
hashing process fails.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
p1 and p2 both come directly from the upgrade list without being copied
so they can be compared directly instead of comparing their names.
Also fix minor style violation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We currently use the pacman version number in the libalpm.pc file. It makes
more sense to use the libalpm version.
Fixes FS#34967.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Remove a question that hasn't been used since the 3.0 days. To prevent
us from having an ugly enum of questions that is missing a bitmask, this
changes the API of the hidden --ask option.
Signed-off-by: Connor Behan <connor.behan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Add details to the doxygen for the initialization and relase functions
of the library.
Signed-off-by: Richard Pougnet <richard@pougnet.ca>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Pull updates from transifex. Add new "id" translation. Regerate po
files with updated filelists...
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Be complete with files listed. Comment out files where code is used
or heavily based on other projects so will never have translatable
strings.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
I imported this translation from transifex without realising that there
was no strings translated despite being "acitve" on transifex for quite
some time. Remove it until translation begins...
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We shouldn't assume a frontend program didn't explicitly set the LC_TIME
setting to a value not in the environment, which is what we previously
assumed. Save the old locale before forcing the 'C' locale and restore
it when we are done.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Run update-po and fix the few errors reported.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Languages: eo, nl, hr, ko, ja, fa, ar, sl, gl, id
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Currently pacman either prints 'adding' or 'upgrading' when installing
a package. This make pacman print and log the other possible actions:
'downgrade' and 'reinstall'
Signed-off-by: Simon Gomizelj <simongmzlj@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This also rearranges some code to ensure that declarations and code
aren't mixed.
Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Since 882bff36 literals would be searched before replacers, resulting in a
package being replaced by another not actually being replaced under certain
conditions (e.g. they're both in the same repo).
This change effectively reversed the expectations in test sync132. This patch
switches the order back to replacers first, thus making sure if a package is
replacing another one, the change will always happen, even if both are in the
same repo.
Note that a package replacing another one in a repo with higher priority will
not be done, see FS#11737 and test sync1105
Signed-off-by: Olivier Brunel <i.am.jack.mail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
During a sysupgrade, if a package is replaced by another, and an update for the
former package is found (on another repo) the replaced package would be
re-installed.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Brunel <i.am.jack.mail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Although technically correct, this results in my system taking ~30 seconds
to resolve all filelists when removing a package that has a directory not
owned by any package. The check for if any package own the empty directory
is a rare enough occurance, and it will be even rarer when that directory
has a directory symlink in its path, so just revert this at this stage.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
alpm_filelist_contains is listed in alpm.h and should be public but was
not exported.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Avoids the segfault seen in FS#33911.
Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Fix FS#31556 by printing filename instead of entryname. Thus,
removing a lot of confusion from the output.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Pacman currently bails when trying to extract a file over a directory
when using --force. Instead of ignoring all conflict, perform the
check and skip any file-file conflicts. Conflicts between directories
and files are still flagged and cause the transation to abort.
As a bonus, we now know about files changing packages when using
--force, so we can skip removing them fixing upgrade046.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
alpm_filelist_contains was being used to search for resolved paths, but
searching in the unresolved paths, causing it to miss matches. We
always search unresolved paths and search the resolved paths if
available because _alpm_filelist_resolve is not public and requires
a context handle, so it can't be called from alpm_filelist_contains.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We were comparing files based on resolved paths but returning the
original file_t structures, which were not necessarily in the same
order. The extra file_t information was only being used to determine if
the file was a directory which can be accomplished by testing for
a trailing slash, so just return the resolved path.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We were comparing files based on resolved paths but returning the
original file_t structures, which were not necessarily in the same
order. The additional file_t information was never used, so just return
the resolved path.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|