summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/pactest/tests/upgrade051.py
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2010-06-02Move pacman test suiteAllan McRae1-15/+0
Move the test suite to test/pacman in order to make a logical location for a future makepkg test suite. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2009-09-09Use sync.c for upgrade transaction prepare and commitNagy Gabor1-3/+1
This patch utilizes the power of sync.c to fix FS#3492 and FS#5798. Now an upgrade transaction is just a sync transaction internally (in alpm), so all sync features are available with -U as well: * conflict resolving * sync dependencies from sync repos * remove unresolvable targets See http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008725.html for the concept. We use "mixed" target list, where PKG_FROM_FILE origin indicates local package file, PKG_FROM_CACHE indicates sync package. The front-end can add only one type of packages (depending on transaction type) atm, but if alpm resolves dependencies for -U, we may get a real mixed trans->packages list. _alpm_pkg_free_trans() was modified so that it can handle both target types _alpm_add_prepare() was removed, we use _alpm_sync_prepare() instead _alpm_add_commit() was renamed to _alpm_upgrade_targets() sync.c (and deps.c) was modified slightly to handle mixed target lists, the modifications are straightforward. There is one notable change here: We don't create new upgrade trans in sync.c, we replace the pkgcache entries with the loaded package files in the target list (this is a bit hackish) and call _alpm_upgrade_targets(). This implies a TODO (pkg->origin_data.db is not accessible anymore), but it doesn't hurt anything with pacman front-end, so it will be fixed later (otherwise this patch would be huge). I updated the documentation of -U and I added a new pactest, upgrade090.py, to test the syncdeps feature of -U. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-07-25pactest: add test.expectfailure option for testsDan McGee1-0/+2
This will enable us to mark tests we know currently fail to differentiate them from those that we know should pass. Regressions should be easier to spot this way. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-02-27* Added 5 new upgrade tests, which check various things with depends,Dan McGee1-0/+15
provides, and conflicts. - upgrade051 is known to fail- but we want to eventually make it work. - upgrade052 is Nagy's bug as reported on the ML- I think. If it isn't, let me know.