summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/pactest
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-01-22Move the deptest code from frontend to backend.Chantry Xavier1-14/+10
The deptest code (pacman -T) used by makepkg was mostly in the frontend. There were 2 drawbacks: 1) the public splitdep function returns a pmdepend_t struct, but the _alpm_dep_free function for freeing it is private. So there was a memleak. 2) there is a helper in the backend (satisfycmp in deps.c) which makes this function much easier. So this adds a new public alpm_deptest in libalpm/deps.c, which cleans pacman_deptest in pacman/deptest.c a lot. Besides, alpm_splitdep was made private, because the frontend no longer requires it, and _alpm_dep_free is also private. Finally the deptest001 pactest was extended. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-01-15Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee8-8/+53
2008-01-15Change the versioned provision format.Chantry Xavier6-7/+7
Change the 'provname provver' format to 'provname=provver'. In .PKGINFO, the provisions are copied from the PKGBUILD without quotes. So the provision version was actually handled as a different provision... See FS#9171. Dan: Unfortunately we have to change our original specification for versioned provisions with this patch, but it ends up being the simpler and cleaner solution in the long run, and if there is any time to change it the time is now before many packages have been built. Keeping the ' ' based format would have required us to do special parsing in repo-add, as well as being susceptible to users not using quotes in their provides array. Hopefully this will resolve the issues we had with our initial plan. Sorry for the confusion. Acked-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-01-15Rename provision related pactests to provision*.py.Chantry Xavier8-3/+48
Also add 3 new pactests to cover both the -U and -S operations for versioned provisions. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-01-12New reason001.py pactestNagy Gabor1-0/+16
This pactest demonstrates that we should copy the reason between the to-be-replaced and replaced packages Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-01-10Move the fallback on providers from backend to frontend.Chantry Xavier1-0/+15
This reverts commit e28973169d2e5eda8b64ebdda11ece0dc761d978. This code might fit better in the frontend than in the backend finally. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-November/010150.html I also changed it for fixing FS#8763 : if there is exactly one provider, pacman will pull it and print a warning. if there are several providers, pacman will list them and fail. It's up to the user to pick one. Add sync501 pactest to reflect that.
2008-01-06conflict.c : fix for FS#8156, detect conflict between symlink and dir.Chantry Xavier1-0/+18
The previous fileconflict check (package vs filesystem) skipped the conflict when the file on the filesystem was a directory or a symlink to a directory, no matter what the file in the package was. Now, the conflict will only be skipped if the file in the package is a directory (so compatible with a dir or a dir symlink on the filesystem). So in the case of 8156 (new fileconflict003 pactest for this case), instead of silently ignoring the extraction of the test symlink, pacman will now fail because of a file conflict between the test symlink in the pkg2 package and the test directory on the filesystem. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2008-01-06bugfix in pactest when creating a symlink at the top level.Chantry Xavier1-1/+2
Trying to make a symlink at the top level previously made pactest fail. For example : "test -> test2/" as a file in a package. The path to the test symlink was empty in this case, but the python code still tried to chdir in "", which failed. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2008-01-06sync.c: add sanity check so we don't dereference a null pointerDan McGee1-0/+26
Originally noticed in FS#9024, but was fixed in previous changes anyway. However, it doesn't hurt to still check it. Also add a pactest from Chantry Xavier for the original problem to ensure we can't reproduce it. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-01-05conflict.c : fix for upgrade042.Chantry Xavier1-0/+28
Thanks to the proactive backup handling, we don't need to add the moving file to the skip_add list. The backup handling will make sure nothing gets overwritten. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010610.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-01-05add.c : fix upgrade026 pactest.Chantry Xavier1-1/+1
This was the case of the bash packaging error where a file was removed from the package but not the backup array. I just added a sanity check so that only the files from the backup array that are also in the filelist are used. I had to edit upgrade026 pactest slightly : it required the file to be copied to .pacsave instead of moved. But just moving it should be enough, as we agreed on the ML : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010440.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2008-01-02new upgade042 pactest + bugfix in chk_filedifference.Chantry Xavier1-0/+28
This adds a pactest for the relocation of a config file between two packages (case of etc/profile moving from bash to filesystem). While running this pactest, I found out that chk_filedifference didn't work correctly with an empty list as second argument. So that's fixed now. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010610.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-29Remove .FILELIST generation from makepkg (and elsewhere)Dan McGee1-18/+2
This is something pacman can do on its own straight from the archive, and we will reduce the chance of problems occurring becuase of inproper FILELIST generation as we have had in the past with special characters in filenames. Once we remove it from makepkg. we can remove any usage of it from all of our other tools, including pacman, pactest, and contrib/ utilities. Note that removing it from pacman uncovered a few other bugs anyway, so this was probably a good move. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-29add a new upgrade026 pactest for backup handling.Chantry Xavier1-0/+17
This is the bash case when the /etc/profile file was removed by error from the package, but stayed in the backup array. Ref: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-December/003556.html Also fixed a little typo in add.c, but it's disabled code. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-12-29fix two broken pactests because of date localization.Chantry Xavier3-5/+24
query002 and sync1100 had PACMAN_OUTPUT rules that looked at the build/install date (localized). Instead of looking at the month name, it will now check the year, which should be safer. I also had to add another pactest (query005) for keeping the same coverage. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-12-19PM_DEP_MOD_LT and PM_DEP_MOD_GT depmods addedNagy Gabor2-0/+28
You can use foo<2.0 and foo>2.0 as depend add046.py and add047.py pactests were added to check this Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-11Add real scriptlet checking for pactestAaron Griffin3-22/+19
Due to commit da1222de2e30aabcae9d17bbfa10bbf0672338af, we can now use fakechroot to completely run scriptlet pactests Use "which" functionality so as not to REQUIRE it for all users Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-11Add "which" path searching functionality to pactestAaron Griffin1-0/+8
Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
2007-12-11Fail sanely on OUTPUT rules when --nolog is passedAaron Griffin1-2/+6
Check for existence of the logfile first, and output an error if not found Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-11Update GNU GPL boilerplate and copyright datesDan McGee8-24/+8
Update the GPL boilerplate to direct people to the GNU website for a copy of the license, as well as bump all of Judd's copyrights to 2007. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-11pactest: if we are root, don't use fakerootDan McGee1-1/+3
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-03Add a lot more tests (and some pactest fixes) to -Si and -Qi testsDan McGee3-8/+33
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-03Add more pactests to increase code coverageDan McGee9-1/+96
These new tests test the following ops at least once: -Ss, -Si, -Sl, -Sp, -Qs, -Qi, -T Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-03Add 4 new pactests to get better code coverage by pactestDan McGee4-0/+20
I started playing around with gcov today and it showed a few places in the code that we don't test at all. This is the start of ensuring that we execute most of the code in our codebase. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-12-01New sync1005 and sync1006 pactestsNagy Gabor2-0/+28
This pactest checks what happens if a package exists in two sync repos. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> [Dan: added sync1006, same test with different versions] Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-25Fix for sync1003 and sync1004 pactestsNagy Gabor1-4/+3
checkdeps and resolvedeps now take both a remove list and an install list as arguments, allowing dependencies to be calculated correctly. This broke the sync990 pactest, but this pactest used dependencies and provides in an unusual way, so it has been changed. Dan: the sync990 pactest was just plain wrong. It didn't satisfy the dependencies correctly, so should never have succeeded. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> [Dan: some variable renaming, clarification in commit message] Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-21Remove -F/--freshen operationDan McGee3-54/+0
This operation made sense in the days before sync DBs existed, but it no longer has the same usefulness it once did. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>
2007-11-19Versioned provisions.Nagy Gabor3-0/+40
This patch introduces versioned provisions in "provision 1.0-1" format. _alpm_db_whatprovides was modified accordingly (added sync500.py), alpm_depcmp was modified accordingly (add043.py passes now; added add044.py and add045.py). Notes: alpm_db_search now uses the whole versioned %PROVIDES% string in its search. debug logging was simplified in alpm_depcmp. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> [Xavier: fixed a few typos, duplicate const strings with strdup before modifying them, put some debugging back in alpm_depcmp, minor code cleanups (var/function renaming), added a note in PKGBUILD man page.] Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> [Dan: made strcmp checks clearer, added a comment] Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-15Remove REQUIREDBY checks from pactestDan McGee3-10/+1
Remove any checks dealing with requiredby from pactest (but not actually from the pactests themselves). Of course, we should probably find a new way to check requiredby values of packages since there is no guarantee our code is working perfectly. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-15new trans001.py pactestNagy Gabor1-0/+20
The pactest demonstrates what happens if fileconflict was found after the removal part of a sync transaction. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-15new add043.py pactestNagy Gabor1-0/+15
Currently alpm_depcmp uses pkg->version as a version number for provisions, which is odd. The failure of the pactest demonstrates this. Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-13Add pactest for IgnoreGroup.Nathan Jones2-0/+23
Also tell pactest to reset IgnoreGroup like it does for IgnorePkg. Signed-off-by: Nathan Jones <nathanj@insightbb.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-11Add two requiredby pactestsChantry Xavier2-0/+42
One currently should succeed (006), and 005 fails. requiredby005.py is originally from Nagy Gabor <ngaba@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-11Add a symlink-based pactestDan McGee1-0/+20
This passes with both the upcoming 3.1 devel tree and the 3.0.6 pacman code. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-11-04Added optdepends support to pactestJeff Mickey4-0/+12
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-10-29simple pactest renaming : split conflict* into depconflict* and fileconflict*.Chantry Xavier6-2/+1
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-10-29pactest: generate the filelist the correct wayDan McGee1-6/+16
Actually use python commands to generate the filelist instead of os.system calls that don't necessarily work everywhere. Noticed when running "make check" on FreeBSD where the tar program is actually bsdtar. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-10-29extend type001 pactest with a symlink.Chantry Xavier1-5/+9
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-10-15Fix scriptlet pactest cases so they 'succeed' againDan McGee2-0/+10
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-10-09Add two new pactests to check symlink behaviorNagy Gabor2-0/+37
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-10-09Add new (failing) sync pactestNagy Gabor1-0/+18
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-09-24libalpm/add.c: fix backup array issueDan McGee6-0/+6
As seen with the recent upgrade of pacman and the removal of the pacman.d/current mirrorlist, files that were formerly in the backup array get deleted upon their removal, which could be dangerous. Instead, we should use the combined backup array of the old and new package. This fix should address this issue in a relatively straightforward way. In addition, old files should be moved to pacsave locations as expected. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-09-24Add sync044 pactest : A dependency induces a replacement.Chantry Xavier1-0/+20
That is the problem mentioned by Nagy there (with suggestions for fixing it) : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-August/009082.html If a dependency conflicts with a local package and has to replace it, the PM_SYNC_TYPE_DEPEND information is lost, and the resulting install reason is wrong (the package is marked as explictly installed). Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-09-24Add two pactests with broken requiredby, and two about pacsave handling.Chantry Xavier4-0/+56
remove048 is the case mentioned there (fails in 3.0 but works in 3.1) : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/009294.html It's the same as remove046 with -R instead of -Rc. sync060 is a case reported this morning on IRC : a pacman -Su wanted to replace gensplashutils by gensplash, but pacman said gensplashutils was required by initscripts-gensplash, while initscripts-gensplash was not even installed. This is also fixed in the current 3.1 code though. upgrade02{4,5} are the backup handling problem I described there : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/009376.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-09-07Fix sync db location in pactest so new location is acceptableDan McGee1-1/+4
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2007-09-07Add a few pactests collected over time.Chantry Xavier6-0/+128
remove047 : Remove a package required by other packages conflict004 : a package conflicts with itself http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-August/009077.html sync400 : Install package with dep that conflicts with older version of package sync401 : Ensure we choose provider already in target list http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/009041.html sync402/sync403 (failing) : Choice between two providers http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008787.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-08-20Add sync1003 pactest.Nagy Gabor1-0/+26
The sync package pkg3 depends on the sync package pkg2, but pkg1 replaces pkg2. So pkg2 is added to the remove list. When checkdeps checks if pkg2 can be removed, it looks at the packages that require pkg2 (with the RequiredBy field of pkg2), but this doesn't contain pkg3 at this point. RequiredBy fields are only updated after the packages are installed. Proposed solution : checkdeps should know both the remove and upgrade list to decide properly. Reference: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008972.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-08-20libalpm/add.c,trans.c : cleanup of requiredby handling.Nagy Gabor1-0/+1
This patch cleans up and fix the _alpm_trans_update_depends function and ensure that all requiredby fields are filled in case of multiple satisfiers (previously, the handling of mutliple satisfiers in that function was inconsistent). This makes a special case handling of requiredby in commit_single_pkg() obsolete, and so allows cleaning that code as well. Also fixed upgrade056 pactest because : 1) the requiredby fields were wrong, and this wouldn't happen with the fixed _alpm_trans_update_depends(). 2) this is a very unusual case anyway (and handling all corner cases combined to a broken database seems nearly impossible to achieve). References : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008919.html http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008920.html Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-08-13Add two pactest for versioned conflicts.Nagy Gabor2-0/+26
A side effect of the previous commit ( ea9a756eeaca7398c0860b55f8abe2932ad195bd ) is that it's now possible to use versioned conflicts. Add two new conflict pactests for showing it. Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
2007-07-20add conflict001 pactest.Nagy Gabor1-0/+19
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3-24-g4f1b (git 2.32.0) at 2024-11-14 02:08:14 +0100