| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Variables such as 'pkgdesc_x86_64' are invalid, instead of ignoring them
raise an error.
This also disallows using 'any' as an architecture specific variable
Signed-off-by: morganamilo <morganamilo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
makepkg will now error if disallowed variables are set inside of
the package function.
Disallowed variables are variables that do exist, like 'makedepends'
and 'pkgver' but can not be set inside of a package function.
Signed-off-by: morganamilo <morganamilo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
In commit f7efa6a93d5361af610827d41045d87c7a72f2b5 we added a new file,
and also wired it up to the build systems, but it got added under the
wrong name in meson.build
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
opt)depends/provides/conflicts
Given the depends
depends=('foo>=1.2-1.par2')
and the error message
==> ERROR: pkgver in depends is not allowed to contain colons, forward slashes, hyphens or whitespace.
One would be lead to believe that the problem is that they gave a pkgrel in
depends at all, not that the pkgrel contains letters.
Each of the (check,make,opt)depends, conflicts, and provides linters use a
glob to trim off properly formed epoch an rel from the full version string,
and pass the remainder to check_pkgver(). This does a good job of
accepting/rejecting full versions, but doesn't do a good job of generating
good error messages when rejecting if it's because of the epoch or rel.
1. Factor out check_epoch() and check_pkgrel() from lint_epoch() and
lint_pkgrel(), similarly to check_pkgver().
2. Add a check_fullpkgver() that takes a full [epoch:]ver[-rel] string and
splits it in to epoch/ver/rel, and calls the appropriate check_ function
on each.
3. Use check_fullpkgver() in the {,check,make,opt}depends, conflicts, and
provides linters.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work
out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give
up on autotools.
Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my
machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under
half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation.
Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build:
meson build
Then, compile the project:
ninja -C build
There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and
autotools. specifically:
1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual
update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make
this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all
update-po targets and runs them.
2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a
suitable tarball for distribution.
|
