| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When scripting/automating around makepkg, it is sometimes desirable to
know how makepkg will be configured to operate. One example is the
archlinux devtools, which must forward select makepkg.conf variables
into a build chroot (for example PACKAGER) or use those variables itself
(for example {SRC,PKG,LOG}DEST).
The configuration file can be in up to 3 places, and should be capable
of being overridden via environment variables. It is sufficiently
complex to represent distinct functionality, and sufficiently useful to
merit easy accessibility in other scripts, therefore, let us move it
into a publicly exposed utility library.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Refactor many of the different arrays of pkgbuild variables
into scripts/libmakepkg/util/schema.sh.in.
Signed-off-by: morganamilo <morganamilo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work
out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give
up on autotools.
Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my
machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under
half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation.
Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build:
meson build
Then, compile the project:
ninja -C build
There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and
autotools. specifically:
1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual
update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make
this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all
update-po targets and runs them.
2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a
suitable tarball for distribution.
|
