summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts/meson.build
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-05-08libmakepkg: install pkg-config fileEli Schwartz1-0/+6
Since makepkg exports a public library of functions, other projects may wish to use these functions. Highlights include parseopts or our messaging functions. Install a pkg-config file in order to let downstream users detect where they can source the libmakepkg functionality. This is useful e.g. to gracefully handle the case where a thirdparty project is configured and installed into a different datarootdir from pacman, but still wants to use the installed pacman's version of libmakepkg. Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-03-07Remove pkgdeltaAllan McRae1-1/+0
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2018-11-27scripts/meson: ensure wrapper scripts are executableDave Reisner1-12/+9
2018-11-27buildsys: remove size_to_humanDave Reisner1-1/+0
This was only ever used by paccache, and paccache has since been moved to pacman-contrib.
2018-11-27meson: separate out wrapped from non-wrapped scriptsDave Reisner1-2/+18
makepkg-template is a perl script and doesn't get wrapped by our shell wrapper. It (wrongly) reads from the host machine rather than the build root, but this is working as implemented.
2018-11-02meson: add a wrapper to bootstrap scripts from within build dirDave Reisner1-4/+29
This doesn't do quite as good of a job of "hiding away" the real script as we did with autotools, but it satisfies the need for being able to run scripts which depend on libmakepkg with the local copy within the repo. We do, however, improve upon the autotools script by ensuring that the bash path used in configuring pacman is the interpreter used to run the underlying script.
2018-11-02Add meson.build files to build with mesonDave Reisner1-0/+66
Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give up on autotools. Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation. Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build: meson build Then, compile the project: ninja -C build There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and autotools. specifically: 1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all update-po targets and runs them. 2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a suitable tarball for distribution.