summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2011-03-23Add PGP signature support to pactestDan McGee2-0/+5
Allow pkg.pgpsig to end up in the created sync databases. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-03-20Fix handling of ignored packagesPang Yan Han1-1/+1
Noted in FS#23342. When the user attempts to install an ignored package and answers no when asked whether to install it, pacman bails out with: "error: target not found: packagename" This is because satisfiers are not found for the package and execution continues to process_group(), where the package is treated as a group (which does not exist). In addition, test ignore006.py is updated with PACMAN_RETCODE=0 since saying no to installing an ignored package should not be considered an error. Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-03-01pactest: use actual regexes in OUTPUT rulesDan McGee14-26/+29
I managed to just make deptest001.py fail by changing a DEBUG-level logger in commit b12be99c89. This should not be this fickle. Enhance the OUTPUT rule to use an actual Python re object when looking for matches, and make a lot of the rules use stronger patterns to match with. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-02-27pactest for removing a required empty directoryAllan McRae1-0/+21
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-02-25Add test case for util-linux/util-linux-ng name switch and depsDan McGee1-0/+45
This case currently fails, but highlights a failure in our install process I experienced the other day. Because we don't do replacement uninstalls inline with the rest of the upgrade uninstalls, we can have a time on our system where a critical package is not installed. I hope no one ever renames glibc. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-02-25Continue resolving dependencies rather than bailing on first errorDan McGee1-0/+17
This allows error messages emitted by the frontend to be a bit more descriptive and not have the annoying "well why didn't you tell me that the first time" problem. If a package had multiple missing deps, we would bail on the first one before rather than finish processing all missing dependencies, and only print one error message. Instead, continue through this entire set of missing deps and append all eventual errors. The added pactest tests this case, as the to be installed package has two missing dependencies. However, pactest does not actually test or see the difference in output from before and after, so it passes in both cases, but it is clearly visible in the logs. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-02-25Various small spelling fixes and small tweaksDan McGee1-1/+1
Nothing that changes behavior here. Spelling fixes and pushing a variable down to the scope it is used. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-02-04Add a new removal smoke testDan McGee2-5/+23
Hint: this will really stress hash table removal. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-31make -d less strict; add -dd optionFlorian Pritz6-14/+10
-d skips checking the version of a dependency. -dd skips the whole dependency check. Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@server-speed.net> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-31add pactests for -SddXavier Chantry6-0/+103
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-31Allow both cleanmethod values to be specified at the same timeDan McGee2-0/+59
No reason to disallow this- it allows keeping even more packages around in the cache. Test cases included for this case and to ensure the default behavior is preserved. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-31Add three clean cache testsDan McGee3-0/+68
The first two are rather standard tests of our two available clean options, and the third is attempting to test a reported bug (and failing to make the given case fail). Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-31pactest: allow checking for cache file existenceDan McGee2-1/+25
This will allow some tests to be added for cache cleaning. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-29pacman/sync: rewrite target handlingXavier Chantry1-1/+1
This uses the new public functions to handle targets from the frontend, like it used to be : 1) alpm_find_dbs_satisfier to find (optionally versioned) package or provision 2) alpm_find_grp_pkgs to find members for a groups 3) alpm_add_pkg to finally add the pmpkg_t from 1 or 2 Of course, this adds more code to the frontend, but it completely deprecates sync_target and sync_dbtarget interfaces. This all-in-one interfaces felt wrong and left no control to the frontend. A good frontend should just use alpm_add_pkg, with pkg coming from alpm_db_get_pkg (for normal targets), alpm_find_dbs_satisfier (for versioned provisions) or alpm_find_grp_pkgs (for groups). This also opens the way to provide a better group handling in pacman without constraint from libalpm and callbacks. In ignore006, only the retcode changes, because no package was found to satisfy the target (the only possible package is ignored). Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
2011-01-29Add interactive provider selectionXavier Chantry2-4/+0
If there are multiple providers in one db, pacman used to just stop at the first one (both during dependency resolution or for pacman -S 'provision' which uses the same code). This adds a new conversation callback so that the user can choose which provider to install. By default (user press enter or --noconfirm), the first provider is still chosen, so for example the behavior of sync402 and 403 is preserved. But at least the user now has the possibility to make the right choice in a manual run. If one of the provider is already installed, it is picked for reinstall/upgrade, so that provision 002/003 pactest now pass. $ pacman -S community/smtp-server :: There are 3 providers available for smtp-server: 1) courier-mta 2) esmtp 3) exim Which one do you want to install? Enter a number (default=1): Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
2011-01-29pactest: pass entire test to rule.check()Dan McGee2-12/+12
We were piecemeal passing fields from the test object in and it was getting out of hand, and future work would have added yet another argument. Instead, just pass the entire test object and entrust the rule to get what it needs. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22Add a few new provides testsDan McGee3-0/+66
These deal with already-installed packages and how they should be the preferred provider in cases where provider selection now occurs. A few involve multiple sync repos. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: sort repos by alpha order in config fileDan McGee2-2/+6
The order was non-deterministic before, and just happened to work for sync023.py as it was written. Ensure there is some sort of predictable ordering. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: use new-style python classesDan McGee6-6/+6
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: revamp modified logicDan McGee6-91/+18
Remove all logic dealing with PKG_MODIFIED as this rule no longer exists. This removes a bunch of unnecessary stat and checksum logic that most of the time we were never even using. Also update the file modified checks to mark every file created using mkfile() with an older time so any modified checks will just work without hacks. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22Modify all pactests to not use PKG_MODIFIEDDan McGee10-10/+14
All conditions that this particular rule tested are better served by using a more specific rule, whether that be checking a package version or whether files inside the package have changed or still exist. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for pmdbDan McGee1-35/+30
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for utilDan McGee1-29/+10
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for pmtestDan McGee3-40/+44
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for pmpkgDan McGee1-13/+8
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for pmruleDan McGee2-14/+12
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for pmenvDan McGee1-1/+0
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for pactestDan McGee1-3/+3
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: pylint changes for pmfileDan McGee1-14/+10
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22Remove epoch as an independent fieldDan McGee12-61/+19
Instead, go the same route we have always taken with version-release in libalpm and treat it all as one piece of information. Makepkg is the only script that knows about epoch as a distinct value; from there on out we will parse out the components as necessary. This makes the code a lot simpler as far as epoch handling goes. The downside here is that we are tossing some compatibility to the wind; packages using force will have to be rebuilt with an incremented epoch to keep their special status. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22Allow version comparison to contain epoch specifierDan McGee1-0/+19
Adapting from RPM, follow the [epoch:]version[-release] syntax. We can also borrow some of their parsing code for our purposes (thanks!). Add some new tests to our vercmp shell script tester for epoch comparisons, and then make the code work with these newfangled epoch specifiers. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: add more testing for epochDan McGee7-0/+48
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-22pactest: Rename epoch pactestsDan McGee4-0/+0
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-21Add a pactest for the situation in FS#7524Dan McGee1-0/+38
Confirming the current behavior. And yes, the error message is still no better than it was when this was reported 3.5 years ago. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-12Add two pactests with non-trivial file countsDan McGee2-0/+30
These are probably useful anyway, but also exposed the double file list bug that will be fixed in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-12pactest: build the filelist using a set()Dan McGee1-6/+4
This will prevent duplicates, which we had plenty of once I made a few tests that had a list of files greater than the normal two. The previous logic was not working quite right. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-10pactest: correctly write epoch and force as necessaryDan McGee3-0/+9
We were missing this in a few places; also add the ability to check the outcome via a new rule type. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-06pactest: Use booleans where it makes senseDan McGee6-6/+6
No need to use 0/1 when we can use False/True for the force option. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-01-06pactest: remove dead functionDan McGee1-50/+0
Stopped being used after commit fa933df65b9. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-12-30Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee1-2/+0
Conflicts: lib/libalpm/sync.c test/pacman/tests/ignore007.py
2010-12-30Respect Ignore{Pkg,Group} for group membersJakob Gruber1-2/+0
Fixes FS#19854. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-12-30Tests: Sync group which includes ignored pkgsJakob Gruber1-0/+23
* FS#19854 (--ignore is ignored with groups) * http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008847.html (operation aborts when a package from a group is ignored/and user chooses not to install it) If a group member is ignored, we expect a) a question whether to install b) after saying 'no' to a), the ignored member not to be installed c) all other group members to be installed d) pacman to execute successfully Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org> (cherry picked from commit 9d0b33fd3327ae6d2b15f50870c0885a2068d492)
2010-12-21Add pactest to test long archive readsDan McGee1-0/+19
This creates two packages with extremely long description lines (500KB and 600 KB), causing our archive read code to perform reallocation to store the whole contents. One of the packages will successfully read while the other will fail for the time being. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-12-21pactest: allow testing of package descriptionDan McGee2-10/+7
And modify the code to not print the full rule string if it is more than 40 characters long; truncate it instead. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-12-13Update pactest suite for change in db structureAllan McRae2-48/+18
Merging desc and depends files in sync and local db. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-12-13alpm/remove.c : respect --dbonly during remove-upgradeXavier Chantry1-7/+1
When a -Sk or -Uk operation induced a removal of an existing local package, --dbonly was not in effect and the files were all removed. Fixing this behavior was already marked as TODO in database012 pactest ------------ TODO: I honestly think the above should NOT delete the original les, it hould upgrade the DB entry without touching anything on the file stem. E.g. this test should be the same as: pacman -R --dbonly dummy && pacman -U --dbonly dummy.pkg.tar.gz ------------ Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> [Dan: small coding style touchup] Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-10-18pactest: use valgrind.supp fileXavier Chantry1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-10-18Tests: '-S repo/group' syntaxJakob Gruber1-0/+23
when calling '-S repo/group', only group members in <repo> should should be installed (group members in other repos are ignored) Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-10-18Tests: Sync group which includes ignored pkgsJakob Gruber1-0/+23
* FS#19854 (--ignore is ignored with groups) * http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008847.html (operation aborts when a package from a group is ignored/and user chooses not to install it) If a group member is ignored, we expect a) a question whether to install b) after saying 'no' to a), the ignored member not to be installed c) all other group members to be installed d) pacman to execute successfully Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2010-10-14Add several pactests for epoch codeDan McGee4-0/+58
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3-24-g4f1b (git 2.32.0) at 2024-11-18 05:34:21 +0100