From 40ea6cd607d5edb2699c084259b237d435313670 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan McGee Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:57:19 -0500 Subject: Depend on name_hash being set This is a fairly valid assumption at this point, or at least as good of one as assuming packages all have names. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee --- lib/libalpm/package.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/libalpm/package.c') diff --git a/lib/libalpm/package.c b/lib/libalpm/package.c index fd3d0c65..947f62e0 100644 --- a/lib/libalpm/package.c +++ b/lib/libalpm/package.c @@ -625,8 +625,7 @@ alpm_pkg_t *_alpm_pkg_find(alpm_list_t *haystack, const char *needle) alpm_pkg_t *info = lp->data; if(info) { - /* a zero hash will cause a fall-through just in case */ - if(info->name_hash && info->name_hash != needle_hash) { + if(info->name_hash != needle_hash) { continue; } -- cgit v1.2.3-24-g4f1b