summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjake%bugzilla.org <>2008-04-04 13:47:13 +0200
committerjake%bugzilla.org <>2008-04-04 13:47:13 +0200
commit5484942765a7bcc4321f136aa6537f479936ad77 (patch)
tree5f597a33fa259c639dcd8a5aa9a5904f206c4069
parent57aa101cf330193c1e4f1f057ed0c62a0e988c66 (diff)
downloadbugzilla-5484942765a7bcc4321f136aa6537f479936ad77.tar.gz
bugzilla-5484942765a7bcc4321f136aa6537f479936ad77.tar.xz
Bug 187566 - Making the upgrading section much clearer and presenting multiple possible methods (CVS, tarball, patch).
-rw-r--r--docs/en/xml/administration.xml217
1 files changed, 189 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/docs/en/xml/administration.xml b/docs/en/xml/administration.xml
index 05096981f..05d693aff 100644
--- a/docs/en/xml/administration.xml
+++ b/docs/en/xml/administration.xml
@@ -1362,35 +1362,196 @@ deny from all
<section id="upgrading">
<title>Upgrading to New Releases</title>
- <para>A plain Bugzilla is fairly easy to upgrade from one version to a
- newer one. Always read the release notes to see if there are any issues
- that you might need to take note of. It is recommended that you take a
- backup of your database and your entire Bugzilla installation before attempting an
- upgrade. You can upgrade a 'clean' installation by untarring a new
- tarball over the old installation. If you are upgrading from 2.12 or
- later, and have cvs installed, you can type <filename>cvs -z3 update</filename>,
- and resolve conflicts if there are any.
+ <para>Upgrading Bugzilla is something we all want to do from time to time,
+ be it to get new features or pick up the latest security fix. How easy
+ it is to update depends on a few factors.
</para>
-
- <para>However, things get a bit more complicated if you've made
- changes to Bugzilla's code. In this case, you may have to re-make or
- reapply those changes. One good method is to take a diff of your customized
- version against the original, so you can survey all that you've changed.
- Hopefully, templatization will reduce the need for
- this in the future.</para>
-
- <para>From version 2.8 onward, Bugzilla databases can be automatically
- carried forward during an upgrade. However, because the developers of
- Bugzilla are constantly adding new
- tables, columns and fields, you'll probably get SQL errors if you just
- update the code and attempt to use Bugzilla. Always run the
- <filename>checksetup.pl</filename>
- script whenever you upgrade your installation.</para>
-
- <para>If you are running Bugzilla version 2.8 or lower, and wish to
- upgrade to the latest version, please consult the file,
- "UPGRADING-pre-2.8" in the Bugzilla root directory after untarring the
- archive.</para>
+
+ <itemizedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>If the new version is a revision or a new point release</para>
+ </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>How many, if any, local changes have been made</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </itemizedlist>
+
+ <para>There are also three different methods to upgrade your installation.
+ </para>
+
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Using CVS (<xref linkend="upgrade-cvs"/>)</para>
+ </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Downloading a new tarball (<xref linkend="upgrade-tarball"/>)</para>
+ </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Applying the relevant patches (<xref linkend="upgrade-patches"/>)</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
+
+ <para>Which options are available to you may depend on how large a jump
+ you are making and/or your network configuration.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>Revisions are normally released to fix security vulnerabilities
+ and are distinguished by an increase in the third number. For example,
+ when 2.16.2 was released, it was a revision to 2.16.1.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>Point releases are normally released when the Bugzilla team feels
+ that there has been a significant amount of progress made between the
+ last point release and the current time. These are often proceeded by a
+ stabilization period and release candidates, however the use of
+ development versions or release candidates is beyond the scope of this
+ document. Point releases can be distinguished by an increase in the
+ second number, or minor version. For example, 2.16.2 is a newer point
+ release than 2.14.5.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>The examples in this section are written as if you were updating
+ to version 2.16.2. The procedures are the same regardless if you are
+ updating to a new point release or a new revision. However, the chance
+ of running into trouble increases when upgrading to a new point release,
+ escpecially if you've made local changes.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>These examples also assume that your Bugzilla installation is at
+ <filename>/var/www/html/bugzilla</filename>. If that is not the case,
+ simply substitute the proper paths where appropriate.
+ </para>
+
+ <example id="upgrade-cvs">
+ <title>Upgrading using CVS</title>
+
+ <para>Every release of Bugzilla, whether it is a revision or a point
+ release, is tagged in CVS. Also, every tarball we have distributed
+ since version 2.12 has been primed for using CVS. This does, however,
+ require that you are able to access cvs-mirror.mozilla.org on port
+ 2401.
+
+ <tip>
+ <para>If you can do this, updating using CVS is probably the most
+ painless method, especially if you have a lot of local changes.
+ </para>
+ </tip>
+ </para>
+
+ <programlisting>
+bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html/bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>cvs login</command>
+Logging in to :pserver:anonymous@cvs-mirror.mozilla.org:2401/cvsroot
+CVS password: <command>anonymous</command>
+bash$ <command>cvs -q update -r BUGZILLA-2_16_2 -dP</command>
+P checksetup.pl
+P collectstats.pl
+P globals.pl
+P docs/rel_notes.txt
+P template/en/default/list/quips.html.tmpl
+ </programlisting>
+
+ <para>
+ <caution>
+ <para>If a line in the output from <command>cvs update</command>
+ begins with a <computeroutput>C</computeroutput> that represents a
+ file with local changes that CVS was unable to properly merge. You
+ need to resolve these conflicts manually before Bugzilla (or at
+ least the portion using that file) will be usable.
+ </para>
+ </caution>
+
+ <note>
+ <para>You also need to run <command>./checksetup.pl</command>
+ before your Bugzilla upgrade will be complete.
+ </para>
+ </note>
+ </para>
+ </example>
+
+ <example id="upgrade-tarball">
+ <title>Upgrading using the tarball</title>
+
+ <para>If you are unable or unwilling to use CVS, another option that's
+ always available is to download the latest tarball. This is the most
+ difficult option to use, especially if you have local changes.
+ </para>
+
+ <programlisting>
+bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html</command>
+bash$ <command>wget ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/webtools/bugzilla-2.16.2.tar.gz</command>
+<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
+bash$ <command>tar xzvf bugzilla-2.16.2.tar.gz</command>
+bugzilla-2.16.2/
+bugzilla-2.16.2/.cvsignore
+bugzilla-2.16.2/1x1.gif
+<emphasis>Output truncated</emphasis>
+bash$ <command>cd bugzilla-2.16.2</command>
+bash$ <command>cp ../bugzilla/localconfig* .</command>
+bash$ <command>cp -r ../bugzilla/data .</command>
+bash$ <command>cd ..</command>
+bash$ <command>mv bugzilla bugzilla.old</command>
+bash$ <command>mv bugzilla-2.16.2 bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>cd bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>./checksetup.pl</command>
+<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
+ </programlisting>
+
+ <para>
+ <warning>
+ <para>The <command>cp</command> commands both end with periods which
+ is a very important detail, it tells the shell that the destination
+ directory is the current working directory. Also, the period at the
+ beginning of the <command>./checksetup.pl</command> is important and
+ can not be omitted.
+ </para>
+ </warning>
+
+ <note>
+ <para>You will now have to reapply any changes you have made to your
+ local installation manually.
+ </para>
+ </note>
+ </para>
+ </example>
+
+ <example id="upgrade-patches">
+ <title>Upgrading using patches</title>
+
+ <para>The Bugzilla team will normally make a patch file available for
+ revisions to go from the most recent revision to the new one. You could
+ also read the release notes and grab the patches attached to the
+ mentioned bug, but it is safer to use the released patch file as
+ sometimes patches get changed before they get checked in (for minor
+ spelling fixes and the like). It is also theorectically possible to
+ scour the fixed bug list and pick and choose which patches to apply
+ from a point release, but this is not recommended either as what you'll
+ end up with is a hodge podge Bugzilla that isn't really any version.
+ This would also make it more difficult to upgrade in the future.
+ </para>
+
+ <programlisting>
+bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html/bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>wget ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/webtools/bugzilla-2.16.1-to-2.16.2.diff.gz</command>
+<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
+bash$ <command>gunzip bugzilla-2.16.1-to-2.16.2.diff.gz</command>
+bash$ <command>patch -p1 &lt; bugzilla-2.16.1-to-2.16.2.diff</command>
+patching file checksetup.pl
+patching file collectstats.pl
+patching file globals.pl
+ </programlisting>
+
+ <para>
+ <caution>
+ <para>If you do this, beware that this doesn't change the entires in
+ your <filename id="dir">CVS</filename> directory so it may make
+ updates using CVS (<xref linkend="upgrade-cvs"/>) more difficult in the
+ future.
+ </para>
+ </caution>
+ </para>
+ </example>
+
</section>
<!-- Integrating Bugzilla with Third-Party Tools -->