summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/en/xml/administration.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjustdave%bugzilla.org <>2008-04-04 13:47:05 +0200
committerjustdave%bugzilla.org <>2008-04-04 13:47:05 +0200
commita7d40ecc64ad467bd9e52653fb37a399ecc0082c (patch)
tree84f843bc02bbe5275e0b8e926f4416401881cb92 /docs/en/xml/administration.xml
parent666b9d62b1d7ba0031a384497b69e2f981bf1799 (diff)
downloadbugzilla-a7d40ecc64ad467bd9e52653fb37a399ecc0082c.tar.gz
bugzilla-a7d40ecc64ad467bd9e52653fb37a399ecc0082c.tar.xz
Bug 257534: Require Perl 5.8.1 or later when running on Windows with ActiveState Perl (there is no official CGI ppm build with a new enough version for Bugzilla on any earlier version of ActiveState Perl)
Patch by Byron Jones <bugzilla@glob.com.au> r=justdave, a=justdave
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/en/xml/administration.xml')
-rw-r--r--docs/en/xml/administration.xml1814
1 files changed, 779 insertions, 1035 deletions
diff --git a/docs/en/xml/administration.xml b/docs/en/xml/administration.xml
index cf52999e4..12c72dd84 100644
--- a/docs/en/xml/administration.xml
+++ b/docs/en/xml/administration.xml
@@ -2,28 +2,13 @@
<chapter id="administration">
<title>Administering Bugzilla</title>
- <subtitle>Or, I just got this cool thing installed. Now what the heck do I
- do with it?</subtitle>
+ <section id="parameters">
+ <title>Bugzilla Configuration</title>
- <para>So you followed
- <quote>
- <xref linkend="installation" />
- </quote>
-
- to the letter, and logged into Bugzilla for the very first time with your
- super-duper god account. You sit, contentedly staring at the Bugzilla Query
- Screen, the worst of the whole mad business of installing this terrific
- program behind you. It seems, though, you have nothing yet to query! Your
- first act of business should be to setup the operating parameters for
- Bugzilla so you can get busy getting data into your bug tracker.</para>
-
- <section id="postinstall-check">
- <title>Post-Installation Checklist</title>
-
- <para>After installation, follow the checklist below to help ensure that
- you have a successful installation. If you do not see a recommended
- setting for a parameter, consider leaving it at the default while you
- perform your initial tests on your Bugzilla setup.</para>
+ <para>Bugzilla is configured by changing various parameters, accessed
+ from the "Edit parameters" link in the page footer. Here are
+ some of the key parameters on that page. You should run down this
+ list and set them appropriately after installing Bugzilla.</para>
<indexterm>
<primary>checklist</primary>
@@ -31,185 +16,102 @@
<procedure>
<step>
- <para>Bring up
- <filename>editparams.cgi</filename>
-
- in your web browser. This should be available as the
- <quote>edit parameters</quote>
-
- link from any Bugzilla screen once you have logged in.</para>
- </step>
-
- <step>
- <para>The
- <quote>maintainer</quote>
-
- is the email address of the person responsible for maintaining this
- Bugzilla installation. The maintainer need not be a valid Bugzilla
- user. Error pages, error emails, and administrative mail will be sent
- with the maintainer as the return email address.</para>
-
- <para>Set
- <quote>maintainer</quote>
-
- to
- <emphasis>your</emphasis>
-
- email address. This allows Bugzilla's error messages to display your
- email address and allow people to contact you for help.</para>
+ <para>
+ <command>maintainer</command>:
+ The maintainer parameter is the email address of the person
+ responsible for maintaining this
+ Bugzilla installation. The address need not be that of a valid Bugzilla
+ account.</para>
</step>
<step>
- <para>The
- <quote>urlbase</quote>
-
- parameter defines the fully qualified domain name and web server path
- to your Bugzilla installation.</para>
-
- <para>For example, if your bugzilla query page is
- http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/query.cgi, set your
- <quote>urlbase</quote>
-
- is http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/.</para>
+ <para>
+ <command>urlbase</command>:
+ This parameter defines the fully qualified domain name and web
+ server path to your Bugzilla installation.</para>
+
+ <para>For example, if your Bugzilla query page is
+ <filename>http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/query.cgi</filename>,
+ set your <quote>urlbase</quote>
+ to <filename>http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/</filename>.</para>
</step>
<step>
<para>
- <quote>usebuggroups</quote>
-
- dictates whether or not to implement group-based security for
- Bugzilla. If set, Bugzilla bugs can have an associated groupmask
- defining which groups of users are allowed to see and edit the
- bug.</para>
-
- <para>Set "usebuggroups" to "on"
- <emphasis>only</emphasis>
-
- if you may wish to restrict access to products. I suggest leaving
- this parameter
- <emphasis>off</emphasis>
-
- while initially testing your Bugzilla.</para>
+ <command>makeproductgroups</command>:
+ This dictates whether or not to automatically create groups
+ when new products are created.
+ </para>
</step>
<step>
<para>
- <quote>usebuggroupsentry</quote>
-
- , when set to
- <quote>on</quote>
-
- , requires that all bugs have an associated groupmask when submitted.
- This parameter is made for those installations where product
- isolation is a necessity.</para>
-
- <para>Set "usebuggroupsentry" to "on" if you absolutely need to
- restrict access to bugs from the moment they are submitted through
- resolution. Once again, if you are simply testing your installation,
- I suggest against turning this parameter on; the strict security
- checking may stop you from being able to modify your new
- entries.</para>
+ <command>useentrygroupdefault</command>:
+ Bugzilla products can have a group associated with them, so that
+ certain users can only see bugs in certain products. When this
+ parameter is set to <quote>on</quote>, this
+ causes the initial group controls on newly created products
+ to place all newly-created bugs in the group
+ having the same name as the product immediately.
+ After a product is initially created, the group controls
+ can be further adjusted without interference by
+ this mechanism.</para>
</step>
<step>
- <para>You run into an interesting problem when Bugzilla reaches a
+ <para>
+ <command>shadowdb</command>:
+ You run into an interesting problem when Bugzilla reaches a
high level of continuous activity. MySQL supports only table-level
write locking. What this means is that if someone needs to make a
change to a bug, they will lock the entire table until the operation
is complete. Locking for write also blocks reads until the write is
- complete. The
- <quote>shadowdb</quote>
-
+ complete. Note that more recent versions of mysql support row level
+ locking using different table types. These types are slower than the
+ standard type, and Bugzilla does not yet take advantage of features
+ such as transactions which would justify this speed decrease. The
+ Bugzilla team are, however, happy to hear about any experiences with
+ row level locking and Bugzilla.</para>
+
+ <para>The <quote>shadowdb</quote>
parameter was designed to get around this limitation. While only a
single user is allowed to write to a table at a time, reads can
continue unimpeded on a read-only shadow copy of the database.
Although your database size will double, a shadow database can cause
an enormous performance improvement when implemented on extremely
high-traffic Bugzilla databases.</para>
-
- <para>Set "shadowdb" to "bug_shadowdb" if you will be running a
- *very* large installation of Bugzilla. The shadow database enables
- many simultaneous users to read and write to the database without
- interfering with one another.
- <note>
- <para>Enabling "shadowdb" can adversely affect the stability of
- your installation of Bugzilla. You should regularly check that your
- database is in sync. It is often advisable to force a shadow
- database sync nightly via
- <quote>cron</quote>
-
- .</para>
- </note>
-
- Once again, in testing you should avoid this option -- use it if or
- when you
- <emphasis>need</emphasis>
-
- to use it, and have repeatedly run into the problem it was designed
- to solve -- very long wait times while attempting to commit a change
- to the database. Mozilla.org began needing
+
+ <para>
+ As a guide, on reasonably old hardware, mozilla.org began needing
<quote>shadowdb</quote>
-
when they reached around 40,000 Bugzilla users with several hundred
Bugzilla bug changes and comments per day.</para>
- <para>If you use the "shadowdb" option, it is only natural that you
- should turn the "queryagainstshadowdb" option "On" as well. Otherwise
- you are replicating data into a shadow database for no reason!</para>
+ <para>The value of the parameter defines the name of the
+ shadow bug database. You will need to set the host and port settings
+ from the params page, and set up replication in your database server
+ so that updates reach this readonly mirror. Consult your database
+ documentation for more detail.</para>
</step>
<step>
<para>
- <quote>headerhtml</quote>
-
- ,
- <quote>footerhtml</quote>
-
- ,
- <quote>errorhtml</quote>
-
- ,
- <quote>bannerhtml</quote>
-
- , and
- <quote>blurbhtml</quote>
-
- are all templates which control display of headers, footers, errors,
- banners, and additional data. We could go into some detail regarding
- the usage of these, but it is really best just to monkey around with
- them a bit to see what they do. I strongly recommend you copy your
- <filename>data/params</filename>
-
- file somewhere safe before playing with these values, though. If they
- are changed dramatically, it may make it impossible for you to
- display Bugzilla pages to fix the problem until you have restored
- your
- <filename>data/params</filename>
-
- file.</para>
-
- <para>If you have custom logos or HTML you must put in place to fit
- within your site design guidelines, place the code in the
- "headerhtml", "footerhtml", "errorhtml", "bannerhtml", or "blurbhtml"
- text boxes.
- <note>
- <para>The "headerhtml" text box is the HTML printed out
- <emphasis>before</emphasis>
+ <command>shutdownhtml</command>:
- any other code on the page, except the CONTENT-TYPE header sent by
- the Bugzilla engine. If you have a special banner, put the code for
- it in "bannerhtml". You may want to leave these settings at the
- defaults initially.</para>
- </note>
+ If you need to shut down Bugzilla to perform administration, enter
+ some descriptive HTML here and anyone who tries to use Bugzilla will
+ receive a page to that effect. Obviously, editparams.cgi will
+ still be accessible so you can remove the HTML and re-enable Bugzilla.
+ :-)
</para>
</step>
<step>
<para>
- <quote>passwordmail</quote>
+ <command>passwordmail</command>:
- is rather simple. Every time a user creates an account, the text of
- this parameter is read as the text to send to the new user along with
+ Every time a user creates an account, the text of
+ this parameter (with substitutions) is sent to the new user along with
their password message.</para>
<para>Add any text you wish to the "passwordmail" parameter box. For
@@ -217,47 +119,44 @@
blurb about how to use Bugzilla at your site.</para>
</step>
+
<step>
<para>
- <quote>useqacontact</quote>
-
- allows you to define an email address for each component, in addition
- to that of the default owner, who will be sent carbon copies of
- incoming bugs. The critical difference between a QA Contact and an
- Owner is that the QA Contact follows the component. If you reassign a
- bug from component A to component B, the QA Contact for that bug will
- change with the reassignment, regardless of owner.</para>
+ <command>movebugs</command>:
+
+ This option is an undocumented feature to allow moving bugs
+ between separate Bugzilla installations. You will need to understand
+ the source code in order to use this feature. Please consult
+ <filename>movebugs.pl</filename> in your Bugzilla source tree for
+ further documentation, such as it is.
+ </para>
+ </step>
+ <step>
<para>
- <quote>usestatuswhiteboard</quote>
+ <command>useqacontact</command>:
- defines whether you wish to have a free-form, overwritable field
+ This allows you to define an email address for each component, in
+ addition
+ to that of the default owner, who will be sent carbon copies of
+ incoming bugs.</para>
+ </step>
+ <step>
+ <para>
+ <command>usestatuswhiteboard</command>:
+ This defines whether you wish to have a free-form, overwritable field
associated with each bug. The advantage of the Status Whiteboard is
that it can be deleted or modified with ease, and provides an
easily-searchable field for indexing some bugs that have some trait
- in common. Many people will put
- <quote>help wanted</quote>
-
- ,
- <quote>stalled</quote>
-
- , or
- <quote>waiting on reply from somebody</quote>
-
- messages into the Status Whiteboard field so those who peruse the
- bugs are aware of their status even more than that which can be
- indicated by the Resolution fields.</para>
-
- <para>Do you want to use the QA Contact ("useqacontact") and status
- whiteboard ("usestatuswhiteboard") fields? These fields are useful
- because they allow for more flexibility, particularly when you have
- an existing Quality Assurance and/or Release Engineering team, but
- they may not be needed for many smaller installations.</para>
+ in common.
+ </para>
</step>
<step>
- <para>Set "whinedays" to the amount of days you want to let bugs go
- in the "New" or "Reopened" state before notifying people they have
+ <para>
+ <command>whinedays</command>:
+ Set this to the number of days you want to let bugs go
+ in the NEW or REOPENED state before notifying people they have
untouched new bugs. If you do not plan to use this feature, simply do
not set up the whining cron job described in the installation
instructions, or set this value to "0" (never whine).</para>
@@ -265,8 +164,8 @@
<step>
<para>
- <quote>commenton</quote>
-
+ <command>commenton*</command>:
+ All these
fields allow you to dictate what changes can pass without comment,
and which must have a comment from the person who changed them.
Often, administrators will allow users to add themselves to the CC
@@ -288,30 +187,17 @@
</step>
<step>
- <para>The
- <quote>supportwatchers</quote>
+ <para>
+ <command>supportwatchers</command>:
- option can be an exceptionally powerful tool in the hands of a power
- Bugzilla user. By enabling this option, you allow users to receive
- email updates whenever other users receive email updates. This is, of
+ Turning on this option allows users to ask to receive copies of
+ all a particular other user's bug email. This is, of
course, subject to the groupset restrictions on the bug; if the
<quote>watcher</quote>
-
would not normally be allowed to view a bug, the watcher cannot get
around the system by setting herself up to watch the bugs of someone
- with bugs outside her privileges. She would still only receive email
- updates for those bugs she could normally view.</para>
-
- <para>For Bugzilla sites which require strong inter-Product security
- to prevent snooping, watchers are not a good idea.</para>
-
- <para>However, for most sites you should set
- <quote>supportwatchers</quote>
-
- to "On". This feature is helpful for team leads to monitor progress
- in their respective areas, and can offer many other benefits, such as
- allowing a developer to pick up a former engineer's bugs without
- requiring her to change all the information in the bug.</para>
+ with bugs outside her privileges. They would still only receive email
+ updates for those bugs she could normally view.</para>
</step>
</procedure>
</section>
@@ -319,120 +205,45 @@
<section id="useradmin">
<title>User Administration</title>
- <para>User administration is one of the easiest parts of Bugzilla.
- Keeping it from getting out of hand, however, can become a
- challenge.</para>
-
<section id="defaultuser">
<title>Creating the Default User</title>
<para>When you first run checksetup.pl after installing Bugzilla, it
will prompt you for the administrative username (email address) and
- password for this "super user". If for some reason you were to delete
+ password for this "super user". If for some reason you delete
the "super user" account, re-running checksetup.pl will again prompt
you for this username and password.</para>
<tip>
- <para>If you wish to add more administrative users, you must use the
- MySQL interface. Run "mysql" from the command line, and use these
- commands ("mysql&gt;" denotes the mysql prompt, not something you
- should type in):
- <command>
- <prompt>mysql&gt;</prompt>
-
- use bugs;</command>
-
- <command>
- <prompt>mysql&gt;</prompt>
-
- update profiles set groupset=0x7ffffffffffffff where login_name =
- "(user's login name)";</command>
+ <para>If you wish to add more administrative users, add them to
+ the "admin" group and, optionally, add edit the tweakparams, editusers,
+ creategroups, editcomponents, and editkeywords groups to add the
+ entire admin group to those groups.
</para>
-
- <para>Yes, that is
- <emphasis>fourteen</emphasis>
-
- <quote>f</quote>
-
- 's. A whole lot of f-ing going on if you want to create a new
- administator.</para>
</tip>
</section>
<section id="manageusers">
<title>Managing Other Users</title>
- <section id="login">
- <title>Logging In</title>
-
- <orderedlist>
- <listitem>
- <para>Open the index.html page for your Bugzilla installation in
- your browser window.</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Click the "Query Existing Bug Reports" link.</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Click the "Log In" link at the foot of the page.</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Type your email address, and the password which was emailed
- to you when you created your Bugzilla account, into the spaces
- provided.</para>
- </listitem>
- </orderedlist>
-
- <para>Congratulations, you are logged in!</para>
- </section>
-
<section id="createnewusers">
<title>Creating new users</title>
<para>Your users can create their own user accounts by clicking the
- "New Account" link at the bottom of each page. However, should you
+ "New Account" link at the bottom of each page (assuming they
+ aren't logged in as someone else already.) However, should you
desire to create user accounts ahead of time, here is how you do
it.</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>After logging in, click the "Users" link at the footer of
- the query page.</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>To see a specific user, type a portion of their login name
- in the box provided and click "submit". To see all users, simply
- click the "submit" button. You must click "submit" here to be
- able to add a new user.</para>
-
- <tip>
- <para>More functionality is available via the list on the
- right-hand side of the text entry box. You can match what you
- type as a case-insensitive substring (the default) of all users
- on your system, a case-sensitive regular expression (please see
- the
- <command>man regexp</command>
-
- manual page for details on regular expression syntax), or a
- <emphasis>reverse</emphasis>
-
- regular expression match, where every user name which does NOT
- match the regular expression is selected.</para>
- </tip>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Click the "Add New User" link at the bottom of the user
- list</para>
+ the query page, and then click "Add a new user".</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Fill out the form presented. This page is self-explanatory.
- When done, click "submit".</para>
+ When done, click "Submit".</para>
<note>
<para>Adding a user this way will
@@ -453,84 +264,71 @@
</orderedlist>
</section>
- <section id="disableusers">
- <title>Disabling Users</title>
-
- <para>I bet you noticed that big "Disabled Text" entry box available
- from the "Add New User" screen, when you edit an account? By entering
- any text in this box and selecting "submit", you have prevented the
- user from using Bugzilla via the web interface. Your explanation,
- written in this text box, will be presented to the user the next time
- she attempts to use the system.
- <warning>
- <para>Don't disable your own administrative account, or you will
- hate life!</para>
-
- <para>At this time,
- <quote>Disabled Text</quote>
-
- does not prevent a user from using the email interface. If you have
- the email interface enabled, they can still continue to submit bugs
- and comments that way. We need a patch to fix this.</para>
- </warning>
- </para>
- </section>
-
<section id="modifyusers">
<title>Modifying Users</title>
- <para>Here I will attempt to describe the function of each option on
- the Edit User screen.</para>
+ <para>To see a specific user, search for their login name
+ in the box provided on the "Edit Users" page. To see all users,
+ leave the box blank.</para>
+
+ <para>You can search in different ways the listbox to the right
+ of the text entry box. You can match by
+ case-insensitive substring (the default),
+ regular expression, or a
+ <emphasis>reverse</emphasis>
+ regular expression match, which finds every user name which does NOT
+ match the regular expression. (Please see
+ the <command>man regexp</command>
+ manual page for details on regular expression syntax.)
+ </para>
+
+ <para>Once you have found your user, you can change the following
+ fields:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Login Name</emphasis>
-
- : This is generally the user's email address. However, if you
- have edited your system parameters, this may just be the user's
- login name or some other identifier.
- <tip>
- <para>For compatability reasons, you should probably stick with
- email addresses as user login names. It will make your life
- easier.</para>
- </tip>
+ <emphasis>Login Name</emphasis>:
+ This is generally the user's full email address. However, if you
+ have are using the emailsuffix Param, this may just be the user's
+ login name. Note that users can now change their login names
+ themselves (to any valid email address.)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Real Name</emphasis>
-
- : Duh!</para>
+ <emphasis>Real Name</emphasis>: The user's real name. Note that
+ Bugzilla does not require this to create an account.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Password</emphasis>
-
- : You can change the user password here. It is normal to only see
- asterisks.</para>
+ <emphasis>Password</emphasis>:
+ You can change the user's password here. Users can automatically
+ request a new password, so you shouldn't need to do this often.
+ If you want to disable an account, see Disable Text below.
+ </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Disable Text</emphasis>
-
- : If you type anything in this box, including just a space, the
- user account is disabled from making any changes to bugs via the
- web interface, and what you type in this box is presented as the
- reason.
+ <emphasis>Disable Text</emphasis>:
+ If you type anything in this box, including just a space, the
+ user is prevented from logging in, or making any changes to
+ bugs via the web interface.
+ The HTML you type in this box is presented to the user when
+ they attempt to perform these actions, and should explain
+ why the account was disabled.
<warning>
- <para>Don't disable the administrator account!</para>
+ <para>Don't disable all the administrator accounts!</para>
</warning>
<note>
- <para>As of this writing, the user can still submit bugs via
- the e-mail gateway, if you set it up, despite the disabled text
- field. The e-mail gateway should
+ <para>The user can still submit bugs via
+ the e-mail gateway, if you set it up, even if the disabled text
+ field is filled in. The e-mail gateway should
<emphasis>not</emphasis>
-
be enabled for secure installations of Bugzilla.</para>
</note>
</para>
@@ -538,830 +336,776 @@
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>CanConfirm</emphasis>
-
- : This field is only used if you have enabled "unconfirmed"
- status in your parameters screen. If you enable this for a user,
- that user can then move bugs from "Unconfirmed" to "Confirmed"
- status (e.g.: "New" status). Be judicious about allowing users to
- turn this bit on for other users.</para>
+ <emphasis>&lt;groupname&gt;</emphasis>:
+ If you have created some groups, e.g. "securitysensitive", then
+ checkboxes will appear here to allow you to add users to, or
+ remove them from, these groups.
+ </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Creategroups</emphasis>
-
- : This option will allow a user to create and destroy groups in
- Bugzilla. Unless you are using the Bugzilla GroupSentry security
- option "usebuggroupsentry" in your parameters, this setting has
- no effect.</para>
+ <emphasis>canconfirm</emphasis>:
+ This field is only used if you have enabled the "unconfirmed"
+ status. If you enable this for a user,
+ that user can then move bugs from "Unconfirmed" to a "Confirmed"
+ status (e.g.: "New" status).</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Editbugs</emphasis>
+ <emphasis>creategroups</emphasis>:
+ This option will allow a user to create and destroy groups in
+ Bugzilla.</para>
+ </listitem>
- : Unless a user has this bit set, they can only edit those bugs
- for which they are the assignee or the reporter.
- <note>
- <para>Leaving this option unchecked does not prevent users from
- adding comments to a bug! They simply cannot change a bug
- priority, severity, etc. unless they are the assignee or
- reporter.</para>
- </note>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ <emphasis>editbugs</emphasis>:
+ Unless a user has this bit set, they can only edit those bugs
+ for which they are the assignee or the reporter. Even if this
+ option is unchecked, users can still add comments to bugs.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Editcomponents</emphasis>
-
- : This flag allows a user to create new products and components,
+ <emphasis>editcomponents</emphasis>:
+ This flag allows a user to create new products and components,
as well as modify and destroy those that have no bugs associated
with them. If a product or component has bugs associated with it,
those bugs must be moved to a different product or component
- before Bugzilla will allow them to be destroyed. The name of a
- product or component can be changed without affecting the
- associated bugs, but it tends to annoy the hell out of your users
- when these change a lot.</para>
+ before Bugzilla will allow them to be destroyed.
+ </para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Editkeywords</emphasis>
-
- : If you use Bugzilla's keyword functionality, enabling this
- feature allows a user can create and destroy keywords. As always,
+ <emphasis>editkeywords</emphasis>:
+ If you use Bugzilla's keyword functionality, enabling this
+ feature allows a user to create and destroy keywords. As always,
the keywords for existing bugs containing the keyword the user
wishes to destroy must be changed before Bugzilla will allow it
- to die. You must be very careful about creating too many new
- keywords if you run a very large Bugzilla installation; keywords
- are global variables across products, and you can often run into
- a phenomenon called "keyword bloat". This confuses users, and
- then the feature goes unused.</para>
+ to die.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>Editusers</emphasis>
-
- : This flag allows a user do what you're doing right now: edit
+ <emphasis>editusers</emphasis>:
+ This flag allows a user to do what you're doing right now: edit
other users. This will allow those with the right to do so to
remove administrator privileges from other users or grant them to
themselves. Enable with care.</para>
</listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ <emphasis>tweakparams</emphasis>:
+ This flag allows a user to change Bugzilla's Params
+ (using <filename>editparams.cgi</filename>.)</para>
+ </listitem>
+
<listitem>
<para>
- <emphasis>PRODUCT</emphasis>
-
- : PRODUCT bugs access. This allows an administrator, with
- product-level granularity, to specify in which products a user
- can edit bugs. The user must still have the "editbugs" privelege
- to edit bugs in this area; this simply restricts them from even
- seeing bugs outside these boundaries if the administrator has
- enabled the group sentry parameter "usebuggroupsentry". Unless
- you are using bug groups, this option has no effect.</para>
+ <emphasis>&lt;productname&gt;</emphasis>:
+ This allows an administrator to specify the products in which
+ a user can see bugs. The user must still have the
+ "editbugs" privilege to edit bugs in these products.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
</section>
</section>
- <section id="programadmin">
- <title>Product, Component, Milestone, and Version Administration</title>
+ <section id="products">
+ <title>Products</title>
- <epigraph>
- <para>Dear Lord, we have to get our users to do WHAT?</para>
- </epigraph>
+ <para>
+ <glossterm linkend="gloss-product" baseform="product">
+ Products</glossterm>
- <section id="products">
- <title>Products</title>
+ are the broadest category in Bugzilla, and tend to represent real-world
+ shipping products. E.g. if your company makes computer games,
+ you should have one product per game, perhaps a "Common" product for
+ units of technology used in multiple games, and maybe a few special
+ products (Website, Administration...)</para>
- <subtitle>Formerly, and in some spots still, called
- "Programs"</subtitle>
+ <para>Many of Bugzilla's settings are configurable on a per-product
+ basis. The number of "votes" available to users is set per-product,
+ as is the number of votes
+ required to move a bug automatically from the UNCONFIRMED status to the
+ NEW status.</para>
- <para>
- <glossterm linkend="gloss-product" baseform="product">
- Products</glossterm>
+ <para>To create a new product:</para>
- are the broadest category in Bugzilla, and you should have the least of
- these. If your company makes computer games, you should have one
- product per game, and possibly a few special products (website,
- meetings...)</para>
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Select "products" from the footer</para>
- <para>A Product (formerly called "Program", and still referred to that
- way in some portions of the source code) controls some very important
- functions. The number of "votes" available for users to vote for the
- most important bugs is set per-product, as is the number of votes
- required to move a bug automatically from the UNCONFIRMED status to the
- NEW status. One can close a Product for further bug entry and define
- various Versions available from the Edit product screen.</para>
+ </listitem>
- <para>To create a new product:</para>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Select the "Add" link in the bottom right</para>
+ </listitem>
- <orderedlist>
- <listitem>
- <para>Select "components" from the yellow footer</para>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Enter the name of the product and a description. The
+ Description field may contain HTML.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
- <tip>
- <para>It may seem counterintuitive to click "components" when you
- want to edit the properties associated with Products. This is one
- of a long list of things we want in Bugzilla 3.0...</para>
- </tip>
- </listitem>
+ <para>Don't worry about the "Closed for bug entry", "Maximum Votes
+ per person", "Maximum votes a person can put on a single bug",
+ "Number of votes a bug in this Product needs to automatically get out
+ of the UNCOMFIRMED state", and "Version" options yet. We'll cover
+ those in a few moments.
+ </para>
+ </section>
- <listitem>
- <para>Select the "Add" link to the right of "Add a new
- product".</para>
- </listitem>
+ <section id="components">
+ <title>Components</title>
+
+ <para>Components are subsections of a Product. E.g. the computer game
+ you are designing may have a "UI"
+ component, an "API" component, a "Sound System" component, and a
+ "Plugins" component, each overseen by a different programmer. It
+ often makes sense to divide Components in Bugzilla according to the
+ natural divisions of responsibility within your Product or
+ company.</para>
+
+ <para>
+ Each component has a owner and (if you turned it on in the parameters),
+ a QA Contact. The owner should be the primary person who fixes bugs in
+ that component. The QA Contact should be the person who will ensure
+ these bugs are completely fixed. The Owner, QA Contact, and Reporter
+ will get email when new bugs are created in this Component and when
+ these bugs change. Default Owner and Default QA Contact fields only
+ dictate the
+ <emphasis>default assignments</emphasis>;
+ these can be changed on bug submission, or at any later point in
+ a bug's life.</para>
+
+ <para>To create a new Component:</para>
- <listitem>
- <para>Enter the name of the product and a description. The
- Description field is free-form.</para>
- </listitem>
- </orderedlist>
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Select the "Edit components" link from the "Edit product"
+ page</para>
+ </listitem>
- <tip>
- <para>Don't worry about the "Closed for bug entry", "Maximum Votes
- per person", "Maximum votes a person can put on a single bug",
- "Number of votes a bug in this Product needs to automatically get out
- of the UNCOMFIRMED state", and "Version" options yet. We'll cover
- those in a few moments.</para>
- </tip>
- </section>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Select the "Add" link in the bottom right.</para>
+ </listitem>
- <section id="components">
- <title>Components</title>
-
- <para>Components are subsections of a Product.
- <example>
- <title>Creating some Components</title>
-
- <informalexample>
- <para>The computer game you are designing may have a "UI"
- component, an "API" component, a "Sound System" component, and a
- "Plugins" component, each overseen by a different programmer. It
- often makes sense to divide Components in Bugzilla according to the
- natural divisions of responsibility within your Product or
- company.</para>
- </informalexample>
- </example>
-
- Each component has a owner and (if you turned it on in the parameters),
- a QA Contact. The owner should be the primary person who fixes bugs in
- that component. The QA Contact should be the person who will ensure
- these bugs are completely fixed. The Owner, QA Contact, and Reporter
- will get email when new bugs are created in this Component and when
- these bugs change. Default Owner and Default QA Contact fields only
- dictate the
- <emphasis>default assignments</emphasis>
-
- ; the Owner and QA Contact fields in a bug are otherwise unrelated to
- the Component.</para>
-
- <para>To create a new Component:</para>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Fill out the "Component" field, a short "Description",
+ the "Initial Owner" and "Initial QA Contact" (if enabled.)
+ The Component and Description fields may contain HTML;
+ the "Initial Owner" field must be a login name
+ already existing in the database.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
+ </section>
- <orderedlist>
- <listitem>
- <para>Select the "Edit components" link from the "Edit product"
- page</para>
- </listitem>
+ <section id="versions">
+ <title>Versions</title>
- <listitem>
- <para>Select the "Add" link to the right of the "Add a new
- component" text on the "Select Component" page.</para>
- </listitem>
+ <para>Versions are the revisions of the product, such as "Flinders
+ 3.1", "Flinders 95", and "Flinders 2000". Version is not a multi-select
+ field; the usual practice is to select the earliest version known to have
+ the bug.
+ </para>
- <listitem>
- <para>Fill out the "Component" field, a short "Description", and
- the "Initial Owner". The Component and Description fields are
- free-form; the "Initial Owner" field must be that of a user ID
- already existing in the database. If the initial owner does not
- exist, Bugzilla will refuse to create the component.
- <tip>
- <para>Is your "Default Owner" a user who is not yet in the
- database? No problem.
- <orderedlist>
- <listitem>
- <para>Select the "Log out" link on the footer of the
- page.</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Select the "New Account" link on the footer of the
- "Relogin" page</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Type in the email address of the default owner you want
- to create in the "E-mail address" field, and her full name in
- the "Real name" field, then select the "Submit Query"
- button.</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Now select "Log in" again, type in your login
- information, and you can modify the product to use the
- Default Owner information you require.</para>
- </listitem>
- </orderedlist>
- </para>
- </tip>
- </para>
- </listitem>
+ <para>To create and edit Versions:</para>
- <listitem>
- <para>Either Edit more components or return to the Bugzilla Query
- Page. To return to the Product you were editing, you must select
- the Components link as before.</para>
- </listitem>
- </orderedlist>
- </section>
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>From the "Edit product" screen, select "Edit Versions"</para>
+ </listitem>
- <section id="versions">
- <title>Versions</title>
-
- <para>Versions are the revisions of the product, such as "Flinders
- 3.1", "Flinders 95", and "Flinders 2000". Using Versions helps you
- isolate code changes and are an aid in reporting.
- <example>
- <title>Common Use of Versions</title>
-
- <informalexample>
- <para>A user reports a bug against Version "Beta 2.0" of your
- product. The current Version of your software is "Release Candidate
- 1", and no longer has the bug. This will help you triage and
- classify bugs according to their relevance. It is also possible
- people may report bugs against bleeding-edge beta versions that are
- not evident in older versions of the software. This can help
- isolate code changes that caused the bug</para>
- </informalexample>
- </example>
-
- <example>
- <title>A Different Use of Versions</title>
-
- <informalexample>
- <para>This field has been used to good effect by an online service
- provider in a slightly different way. They had three versions of
- the product: "Production", "QA", and "Dev". Although it may be the
- same product, a bug in the development environment is not normally
- as critical as a Production bug, nor does it need to be reported
- publicly. When used in conjunction with Target Milestones, one can
- easily specify the environment where a bug can be reproduced, and
- the Milestone by which it will be fixed.</para>
- </informalexample>
- </example>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>You will notice that the product already has the default
+ version "undefined". Click the "Add" link in the bottom right.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Enter the name of the Version. This field takes text only.
+ Then click the "Add" button.</para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ </orderedlist>
+ </section>
+
+ <section id="milestones">
+ <title>Milestones</title>
+
+ <para>Milestones are "targets" that you plan to get a bug fixed by. For
+ example, you have a bug that you plan to fix for your 3.0 release, it
+ would be assigned the milestone of 3.0.</para>
+
+ <note>
+ <para>Milestone options will only appear for a Product if you turned
+ on the "usetargetmilestone" Param in the "Edit Parameters" screen.
</para>
+ </note>
- <para>To create and edit Versions:</para>
+ <para>To create new Milestones, set Default Milestones, and set
+ Milestone URL:</para>
- <orderedlist>
- <listitem>
- <para>From the "Edit product" screen, select "Edit Versions"</para>
- </listitem>
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Select "Edit milestones" from the "Edit product" page.</para>
+ </listitem>
- <listitem>
- <para>You will notice that the product already has the default
- version "undefined". If your product doesn't use version numbers,
- you may want to leave this as it is or edit it so that it is "---".
- You can then go back to the edit versions page and add new versions
- to your product.</para>
-
- <para>Otherwise, click the "Add" button to the right of the "Add a
- new version" text.</para>
- </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Select "Add" in the bottom right corner.
+ text</para>
+ </listitem>
- <listitem>
- <para>Enter the name of the Version. This can be free-form
- characters up to the limit of the text box. Then select the "Add"
- button.</para>
- </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Enter the name of the Milestone in the "Milestone" field. You
+ can optionally set the "sortkey", which is a positive or negative
+ number (-255 to 255) that defines where in the list this particular
+ milestone appears. This is because milestones often do not
+ occur in alphanumeric order For example, "Future" might be
+ after "Release 1.2". Select "Add".</para>
+ </listitem>
- <listitem>
- <para>At this point you can select "Edit" to edit more Versions, or
- return to the "Query" page, from which you can navigate back to the
- product through the "components" link at the foot of the Query
- page.</para>
- </listitem>
- </orderedlist>
- </section>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>From the Edit product screen, you can enter the URL of a
+ page which gives information about your milestones and what
+ they mean. </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
+ </section>
+
+ <section id="voting">
+ <title>Voting</title>
- <section id="milestones">
- <title>Milestones</title>
+ <para>Voting allows users to be given a pot of votes which they can allocate
+ to bugs, to indicate that they'd like them fixed.
+ This allows developers to gauge
+ user need for a particular enhancement or bugfix. By allowing bugs with
+ a certain number of votes to automatically move from "UNCONFIRMED" to
+ "NEW", users of the bug system can help high-priority bugs garner
+ attention so they don't sit for a long time awaiting triage.</para>
- <para>Milestones are "targets" that you plan to get a bug fixed by. For
- example, you have a bug that you plan to fix for your 3.0 release, it
- would be assigned the milestone of 3.0. Or, you have a bug that you
- plan to fix for 2.8, this would have a milestone of 2.8.</para>
+ <para>To modify Voting settings:</para>
- <note>
- <para>Milestone options will only appear for a Product if you turned
- the "usetargetmilestone" field in the "Edit Parameters" screen
- "On".</para>
- </note>
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Navigate to the "Edit product" screen for the Product you
+ wish to modify</para>
+ </listitem>
- <para>To create new Milestones, set Default Milestones, and set
- Milestone URL:</para>
+ <listitem>
+ <para><emphasis>Maximum Votes per person</emphasis>:
+ Setting this field to "0" disables voting.</para>
+ </listitem>
- <orderedlist>
- <listitem>
- <para>Select "edit milestones"</para>
- </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para><emphasis>Maximum Votes a person can put on a single
+ bug</emphasis>:
+ It should probably be some number lower than the
+ "Maximum votes per person". Don't set this field to "0" if
+ "Maximum votes per person" is non-zero; that doesn't make
+ any sense.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para><emphasis>Number of votes a bug in this product needs to
+ automatically get out of the UNCONFIRMED state</emphasis>:
+ Setting this field to "0" disables the automatic move of
+ bugs from UNCONFIRMED to NEW.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <para>Once you have adjusted the values to your preference, click
+ "Update".</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
+ </section>
+
+ <section id="quips">
+ <title>Quips</title>
+
+ <para>
+ Quips are small text messages that can be configured to appear
+ next to search results. A Bugzilla installation can have its own specific
+ quips. Whenever a quip needs to be displayed, a random selection
+ is made from the pool of already existing quips.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Quips are controlled by the <emphasis>enablequips</emphasis> parameter.
+ It has several possible values: on, approved, frozen or off.
+ In order to enable quips approval you need to set this parameter
+ to "approved". In this way, users are free to submit quips for
+ addition but an administrator must explicitly approve them before
+ they are actually used.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In order to see the user interface for the quips, it is enough to click
+ on a quip when it is displayed together with the search results. Or
+ it can be seen directly in the browser by visiting the quips.cgi URL
+ (prefixed with the usual web location of the Bugzilla installation).
+ Once the quip interface is displayed, it is enough to click the
+ "view and edit the whole quip list" in order to see the administration
+ page. A page with all the quips available in the database will
+ be displayed.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Next to each tip there is a checkbox, under the
+ "Approved" column. Quips who have this checkbox checked are
+ already approved and will appear next to the search results.
+ The ones that have it unchecked are still preserved in the
+ database but they will not appear on search results pages.
+ User submitted quips have initially the checkbox unchecked.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Also, there is a delete link next to each quip,
+ which can be used in order to permanently delete a quip.
+ </para>
+ </section>
+
+ <section id="groups">
+ <title>Groups and Group Security</title>
+
+ <para>Groups allow the administrator
+ to isolate bugs or products that should only be seen by certain people.
+ The association between products and groups is controlled from
+ the product edit page under <quote>Edit Group Controls.</quote>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If the makeproductgroups param is on, a new group will be automatically
+ created for every new product. It is primarily available for backward
+ compatibility with older sites.
+ </para>
+ <para>
+ Note that group permissions are such that you need to be a member
+ of <emphasis>all</emphasis> the groups a bug is in, for whatever
+ reason, to see that bug. Similarly, you must be a member
+ of <emphasis>all</emphasis> of the entry groups for a product
+ to add bugs to a product and you must be a member
+ of <emphasis>all</emphasis> of the canedit groups for a product
+ in order to make <emphasis>any</emphasis> change to bugs in that
+ product.
+ </para>
+ <section>
+ <title>Creating Groups</title>
+ <para>To create Groups:</para>
+
+ <orderedlist>
<listitem>
- <para>Select "Add" to the right of the "Add a new milestone"
- text</para>
+ <para>Select the <quote>groups</quote>
+ link in the footer.</para>
</listitem>
-
+
<listitem>
- <para>Enter the name of the Milestone in the "Milestone" field. You
- can optionally set the "Sortkey", which is a positive or negative
- number (-255 to 255) that defines where in the list this particular
- milestone appears. Select "Add".</para>
-
- <example>
- <title>Using SortKey with Target Milestone</title>
-
- <informalexample>
- <para>Let's say you create a target milestone called "Release
- 1.0", with Sortkey set to "0". Later, you realize that you will
- have a public beta, called "Beta1". You can create a Milestone
- called "Beta1", with a Sortkey of "-1" in order to ensure
- people will see the Target Milestone of "Beta1" earlier on the
- list than "Release 1.0"</para>
- </informalexample>
- </example>
+ <para>Take a moment to understand the instructions on the <quote>Edit
+ Groups</quote> screen, then select the <quote>Add Group</quote> link.</para>
</listitem>
-
+
<listitem>
- <para>If you want to add more milestones, select the "Edit" link.
- If you don't, well shoot, you have to go back to the "query" page
- and select "components" again, and make your way back to the
- Product you were editing.
- <note>
- <para>This is another in the list of unusual user interface
- decisions that we'd like to get cleaned up. Shouldn't there be a
- link to the effect of "edit the Product I was editing when I
- ended up here"? In any case, clicking "components" in the footer
- takes you back to the "Select product" screen, from which you can
- begin editing your product again.</para>
- </note>
- </para>
+ <para>Fill out the <quote>Group</quote>, <quote>Description</quote>,
+ and <quote>User RegExp</quote> fields.
+ <quote>User RegExp</quote> allows you to automatically
+ place all users who fulfill the Regular Expression into the new group.
+ When you have finished, click <quote>Add</quote>.</para>
+ <para>Users whose email addresses match the regular expression
+ will automatically be members of the group as long as their
+ email addresses continue to match the regular expression.</para>
+ <note>
+ <para>This is a change from 2.16 where the regular expression
+ resulted in a user acquiring permanent membership in a group.
+ To remove a user from a group the user was in due to a regular
+ expression in version 2.16 or earlier, the user must be explicitly
+ removed from the group.</para>
+ </note>
+ <warning>
+ <para>If specifying a domain in the regexp, make sure you end
+ the regexp with a $. Otherwise, when granting access to
+ "@mycompany\.com", you will allow access to
+ 'badperson@mycompany.com.cracker.net'. You need to use
+ '@mycompany\.com$' as the regexp.</para>
+ </warning>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>From the Edit product screen again (once you've made your way
- back), enter the URL for a description of what your milestones are
- for this product in the "Milestone URL" field. It should be of the
- format "http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/product_milestones.html"</para>
-
- <para>Some common uses of this field include product descriptions,
- product roadmaps, and of course a simple description of the meaning
- of each milestone.</para>
+ <para>If you plan to use this group to directly control
+ access to bugs, check the "use for bugs" box. Groups
+ not used for bugs are still useful because other groups
+ can include the group as a whole.</para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>If you're using Target Milestones, the "Default Milestone"
- field must have some kind of entry. If you really don't care if
- people set coherent Target Milestones, simply leave this at the
- default, "---". However, controlling and regularly updating the
- Default Milestone field is a powerful tool when reporting the
- status of projects.</para>
-
- <para>Select the "Update" button when you are done.</para>
+ <para>After you add your new group, edit the new group. On the
+ edit page, you can specify other groups that should be included
+ in this group and which groups should be permitted to add and delete
+ users from this group.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
+
</section>
-
- <section id="voting">
- <title>Voting</title>
-
- <para>The concept of "voting" is a poorly understood, yet powerful
- feature for the management of open-source projects. Each user is
- assigned so many Votes per product, which they can freely reassign (or
- assign multiple votes to a single bug). This allows developers to gauge
- user need for a particular enhancement or bugfix. By allowing bugs with
- a certain number of votes to automatically move from "UNCONFIRMED" to
- "NEW", users of the bug system can help high-priority bugs garner
- attention so they don't sit for a long time awaiting triage.</para>
-
- <para>The daunting challenge of Votes is deciding where you draw the
- line for a "vocal majority". If you only have a user base of 100 users,
- setting a low threshold for bugs to move from UNCONFIRMED to NEW makes
- sense. As the Bugzilla user base expands, however, these thresholds
- must be re-evaluated. You should gauge whether this feature is worth
- the time and close monitoring involved, and perhaps forego
- implementation until you have a critical mass of users who demand
- it.</para>
-
- <para>To modify Voting settings:</para>
-
+ <section>
+ <title>Assigning Users to Groups</title>
+ <para>Users can become a member of a group in several ways.</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
- <para>Navigate to the "Edit product" screen for the Product you
- wish to modify</para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Set "Maximum Votes per person" to your calculated value.
- Setting this field to "0" disables voting.</para>
+ <para>The user can be explicitly placed in the group by editing
+ the user's own profile</para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>Set "Maximum Votes a person can put on a single bug" to your
- calculated value. It should probably be some number lower than the
- "Maximum votes per person". Setting this field to "0" disables
- voting, but leaves the voting options open to the user. This is
- confusing.</para>
+ <para>The group can include another group of which the user is
+ a member.</para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>Set "Number of votes a bug in this product needs to
- automatically get out of the UNCONFIRMED state" to your calculated
- number. Setting this field to "0" disables the automatic move of
- bugs from UNCONFIRMED to NEW. Some people advocate leaving this at
- "0", but of what use are Votes if your Bugzilla user base is unable
- to affect which bugs appear on Development radar?
- <tip>
- <para>You should probably set this number to higher than a small
- coalition of Bugzilla users can influence it. Most sites use this
- as a "referendum" mechanism -- if users are able to vote a bug
- out of UNCONFIRMED, it is a
- <emphasis>really</emphasis>
-
- bad bug!</para>
- </tip>
- </para>
- </listitem>
-
- <listitem>
- <para>Once you have adjusted the values to your preference, select
- the "Update" button.</para>
+ <para>The user's email address can match a regular expression
+ that the group specifies to automatically grant membership to
+ the group.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</section>
-
- <section id="groups">
- <title>Groups and Group Security</title>
-
- <para>Groups can be very useful in bugzilla, because they allow users
- to isolate bugs or products that should only be seen by certain people.
- Groups can also be a complicated minefield of interdependencies and
- weirdness if mismanaged.
- <example>
- <title>When to Use Group Security</title>
-
- <informalexample>
- <para>Many Bugzilla sites isolate "Security-related" bugs from all
- other bugs. This way, they can have a fix ready before the security
- vulnerability is announced to the world. You can create a
- "Security" product which, by default, has no members, and only add
- members to the group (in their individual User page, as described
- under User Administration) who should have priveleged access to
- "Security" bugs. Alternately, you may create a Group independently
- of any Product, and change the Group mask on individual bugs to
- restrict access to members only of certain Groups.</para>
- </informalexample>
- </example>
-
- Groups only work if you enable the "usebuggroups" paramater. In
- addition, if the "usebuggroupsentry" parameter is "On", one can
- restrict access to products by groups, so that only members of a
- product group are able to view bugs within that product. Group security
- in Bugzilla can be divided into two categories: Generic and
- Product-Based.</para>
-
- <note>
- <para>Groups in Bugzilla are a complicated beast that evolved out of
- very simple user permission bitmasks, apparently itself derived from
- common concepts in UNIX access controls. A "bitmask" is a
- fixed-length number whose value can describe one, and only one, set
- of states. For instance, UNIX file permissions are assigned bitmask
- values: "execute" has a value of 1, "write" has a value of 2, and
- "read" has a value of 4. Add them together, and a file can be read,
- written to, and executed if it has a bitmask of "7". (This is a
- simplified example -- anybody who knows UNIX security knows there is
- much more to it than this. Please bear with me for the purpose of
- this note.) The only way a bitmask scheme can work is by doubling the
- bit count for each value. Thus if UNIX wanted to offer another file
- permission, the next would have to be a value of 8, then the next 16,
- the next 32, etc.</para>
-
- <para>Similarly, Bugzilla offers a bitmask to define group
- permissions, with an internal limit of 64. Several are already
- occupied by built-in permissions. The way around this limitation is
- to avoid assigning groups to products if you have many products,
- avoid bloating of group lists, and religiously prune irrelevant
- groups. In reality, most installations of Bugzilla support far fewer
- than 64 groups, so this limitation has not hit for most sites, but it
- is on the table to be revised for Bugzilla 3.0 because it interferes
- with the security schemes of some administrators.</para>
- </note>
-
- <para>To enable Generic Group Security ("usebuggroups"):</para>
-
+
+ <section>
+ <title>Assigning Group Controls to Products</title>
+ <para>
+ On the product edit page, there is a page to edit the
+ <quote>Group Controls</quote>
+ for a product. This allows you to
+ configure how a group relates to the product.
+ Groups may be applicable, default,
+ and mandatory as well as used to control entry
+ or used to make bugs in the product
+ totally read-only unless the group restrictions are met.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ For each group, it is possible to specify if membership in that
+ group is...
+ </para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
- <para>Turn "On" "usebuggroups" in the "Edit Parameters"
- screen.</para>
+ <para>
+ required for bug entry,
+ </para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>You will generally have no groups set up. Select the "groups"
- link in the footer.</para>
+ <para>
+ Not applicable to this product(NA),
+ a possible restriction for a member of the
+ group to place on a bug in this product(Shown),
+ a default restriction for a member of the
+ group to place on a bug in this product(Default),
+ or a mandatory restriction to be placed on bugs
+ in this product(Mandatory).
+ </para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>Take a moment to understand the instructions on the "Edit
- Groups" screen. Once you feel confident you understand what is
- expected of you, select the "Add Group" link.</para>
+ <para>
+ Not applicable by non-members to this product(NA),
+ a possible restriction for a non-member of the
+ group to place on a bug in this product(Shown),
+ a default restriction for a non-member of the
+ group to place on a bug in this product(Default),
+ or a mandatory restriction to be placed on bugs
+ in this product when entered by a non-member(Mandatory).
+ </para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>Fill out the "New Name" (remember, no spaces!), "New
- Description", and "New User RegExp" fields. "New User RegExp"
- allows you to automatically place all users who fulfill the Regular
- Expression into the new group.
- <example>
- <title>Creating a New Group</title>
-
- <informalexample>
- <para>I created a group called DefaultGroup with a description
- of
- <quote>This is simply a group to play with</quote>
-
- , and a New User RegExp of
- <quote>.*@mydomain.tld</quote>
-
- . This new group automatically includes all Bugzilla users with
- "@mydomain.tld" at the end of their user id. When I finished,
- my new group was assigned bit #128.</para>
- </informalexample>
- </example>
-
- When you have finished, select the Add button.</para>
+ <para>
+ required in order to make <emphasis>any</emphasis> change
+ to bugs in this product <emphasis>including comments.</emphasis>
+ </para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
-
- <para>To enable Product-Based Group Security
- (usebuggroupsentry):</para>
-
- <warning>
- <para>Don't forget that you only have 64 groups masks available,
- total, for your installation of Bugzilla! If you plan on having more
- than 50 products in your individual Bugzilla installation, and
- require group security for your products, you should consider either
- running multiple Bugzillas or using Generic Group Security instead of
- Product-Based ("usebuggroupsentry") Group Security.</para>
- </warning>
-
+ <para>These controls are often described in this order, so a
+ product that requires a user to be a member of group "foo"
+ to enter a bug and then requires that the bug stay resticted
+ to group "foo" at all times and that only members of group "foo"
+ can edit the bug even if they otherwise could see the bug would
+ have its controls summarized by...</para>
+ <programlisting>
+foo: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY, CANEDIT
+ </programlisting>
+
+ </section>
+ <section>
+ <title>Common Applications of Group Controls</title>
+ <section>
+ <title>General User Access With Security Group</title>
+ <para>To permit any user to file bugs in each product (A, B, C...)
+ and to permit any user to submit those bugs into a security
+ group....</para>
+ <programlisting>
+Product A...
+security: SHOWN/SHOWN
+Product B...
+security: SHOWN/SHOWN
+Product C...
+security: SHOWN/SHOWN
+ </programlisting>
+ </section>
+ <section>
+ <title>General User Access With A Security Product</title>
+ <para>To permit any user to file bugs in a Security product
+ while keeping those bugs from becoming visible to anyone
+ outside the securityworkers group unless a member of the
+ securityworkers group removes that restriction....</para>
+ <programlisting>
+Product Security...
+securityworkers: DEFAULT/MANDATORY
+ </programlisting>
+ </section>
+ <section>
+ <title>Product Isolation With Common Group</title>
+ <para>To permit users of product A to access the bugs for
+ product A, users of product B to access product B, and support
+ staff to access both, 3 groups are needed</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
- <para>Turn "On" "usebuggroups" and "usebuggroupsentry" in the "Edit
- Parameters" screen.</para>
-
- <warning>
- <para>"usebuggroupsentry" has the capacity to prevent the
- administrative user from directly altering bugs because of
- conflicting group permissions. If you plan on using
- "usebuggroupsentry", you should plan on restricting
- administrative account usage to administrative duties only. In
- other words, manage bugs with an unpriveleged user account, and
- manage users, groups, Products, etc. with the administrative
- account.</para>
- </warning>
+ <para>Support: Contains members of the support staff.</para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>You will generally have no Groups set up, unless you enabled
- "usebuggroupsentry" prior to creating any Products. To create
- "Generic Group Security" groups, follow the instructions given
- above. To create Product-Based Group security, simply follow the
- instructions for creating a new Product. If you need to add users
- to these new groups as you create them, you will find the option to
- add them to the group available under the "Edit User"
- screens.</para>
+ <para>AccessA: Contains users of product A and the Support group.</para>
+ </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>AccessB: Contains users of product B and the Support group.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
-
- <para>You may find this example illustrative for how bug groups work.
- <example>
- <title>Bugzilla Groups</title>
-
- <literallayout>Bugzilla Groups example ----------------------- For
- this example, let us suppose we have four groups, call them Group1,
- Group2, Group3, and Group4. We have 5 users, User1, User2, User3,
- User4, User5. We have 8 bugs, Bug1, ..., Bug8. Group membership is
- defined by this chart: (X denotes that user is in that group.) (I
- apologize for the nasty formatting of this table. Try viewing it in a
- text-based browser or something for now. -MPB) G G G G r r r r o o o
- o u u u u p p p p 1 2 3 4 +-+-+-+-+ User1|X| | | | +-+-+-+-+ User2|
- |X| | | +-+-+-+-+ User3|X| |X| | +-+-+-+-+ User4|X|X|X| | +-+-+-+-+
- User5| | | | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug restrictions are defined by this chart:
- (X denotes that bug is restricted to that group.) G G G G r r r r o o
- o o u u u u p p p p 1 2 3 4 +-+-+-+-+ Bug1| | | | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug2|
- |X| | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug3| | |X| | +-+-+-+-+ Bug4| | | |X| +-+-+-+-+
- Bug5|X|X| | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug6|X| |X| | +-+-+-+-+ Bug7|X|X|X| |
- +-+-+-+-+ Bug8|X|X|X|X| +-+-+-+-+ Who can see each bug? Bug1 has no
- group restrictions. Therefore, Bug1 can be seen by any user, whatever
- their group membership. This is going to be the only bug that User5
- can see, because User5 isn't in any groups. Bug2 can be seen by
- anyone in Group2, that is User2 and User4. Bug3 can be seen by anyone
- in Group3, that is User3 and User4. Bug4 can be seen by anyone in
- Group4. Nobody is in Group4, so none of these users can see Bug4.
- Bug5 can be seen by anyone who is in _both_ Group1 and Group2. This
- is only User4. User1 cannot see it because he is not in Group2, and
- User2 cannot see it because she is not in Group1. Bug6 can be seen by
- anyone who is in both Group1 and Group3. This would include User3 and
- User4. Similar to Bug5, User1 cannot see Bug6 because he is not in
- Group3. Bug7 can be seen by anyone who is in Group1, Group2, and
- Group3. This is only User4. All of the others are missing at least
- one of those group privileges, and thus cannot see the bug. Bug8 can
- be seen by anyone who is in Group1, Group2, Group3, and Group4. There
- is nobody in all four of these groups, so nobody can see Bug8. It
- doesn't matter that User4 is in Group1, Group2, and Group3, since he
- isn't in Group4.</literallayout>
- </example>
- </para>
+ <para>Once these 3 groups are defined, the products group controls
+ can be set to..</para>
+ <programlisting>
+Product A...
+AccessA: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
+Product B...
+AccessB: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
+ </programlisting>
+ <para>Optionally, the support group could be permitted to make
+ bugs inaccessible to the users and could be permitted to publish
+ bugs relevant to all users in a common product that is read-only
+ to anyone outside the support group. That configuration could
+ be...</para>
+ <programlisting>
+Product A...
+AccessA: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
+Support: SHOWN/NA
+Product B...
+AccessB: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
+Support: SHOWN/NA
+Product Common...
+Support: ENTRY, DEFAULT/MANDATORY, CANEDIT
+ </programlisting>
+ </section>
</section>
</section>
- <section id="security">
- <title>Bugzilla Security</title>
+ <section id="upgrading">
+ <title>Upgrading to New Releases</title>
- <epigraph>
- <para>Putting your money in a wall safe is better protection than
- depending on the fact that no one knows that you hide your money in a
- mayonnaise jar in your fridge.</para>
- </epigraph>
+ <warning>
+ <para>Upgrading is a one-way process. You should backup your database
+ and current Bugzilla directory before attempting the upgrade. If you wish
+ to revert to the old Bugzilla version for any reason, you will have to
+ restore from these backups.
+ </para>
+ </warning>
- <note>
- <para>Poorly-configured MySQL, Bugzilla, and FTP installations have
- given attackers full access to systems in the past. Please take these
- guidelines seriously, even for Bugzilla machines hidden away behind
- your firewall. 80% of all computer trespassers are insiders, not
- anonymous crackers.</para>
- </note>
+ <para>Upgrading Bugzilla is something we all want to do from time to time,
+ be it to get new features or pick up the latest security fix. How easy
+ it is to update depends on a few factors.
+ </para>
- <para>Secure your installation.
- <note>
- <para>These instructions must, of necessity, be somewhat vague since
- Bugzilla runs on so many different platforms. If you have refinements
- of these directions for specific platforms, please submit them to
- <ulink url="mailto://mozilla-webtools@mozilla.org">
- mozilla-webtools@mozilla.org</ulink>
- </para>
- </note>
+ <itemizedlist>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>If the new version is a revision or a new point release</para>
+ </listitem>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>How many, if any, local changes have been made</para>
+ </listitem>
+ </itemizedlist>
+
+ <para>There are also three different methods to upgrade your installation.
+ </para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
- <para>Ensure you are running at least MysQL version 3.22.32 or newer.
- Earlier versions had notable security holes and poorly secured
- default configuration choices.</para>
+ <para>Using CVS (<xref linkend="upgrade-cvs"/>)</para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>
- <emphasis>There is no substitute for understanding the tools on your
- system!</emphasis>
-
- Read
- <ulink
- url="http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_Privilege_system.html">
- The MySQL Privilege System</ulink>
-
- until you can recite it from memory!</para>
-
- <para>At the very least, ensure you password the "mysql -u root"
- account and the "bugs" account, establish grant table rights (consult
- the Keystone guide in Appendix C: The Bugzilla Database for some
- easy-to-use details) that do not allow CREATE, DROP, RELOAD,
- SHUTDOWN, and PROCESS for user "bugs". I wrote up the Keystone advice
- back when I knew far less about security than I do now : )</para>
+ <para>Downloading a new tarball (<xref linkend="upgrade-tarball"/>)</para>
</listitem>
-
<listitem>
- <para>Lock down /etc/inetd.conf. Heck, disable inet entirely on this
- box. It should only listen to port 25 for Sendmail and port 80 for
- Apache.</para>
+ <para>Applying the relevant patches (<xref linkend="upgrade-patches"/>)</para>
</listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
- <listitem>
- <para>Do not run Apache as
- <quote>nobody</quote>
+ <para>Which options are available to you may depend on how large a jump
+ you are making and/or your network configuration.
+ </para>
- . This will require very lax permissions in your Bugzilla
- directories. Run it, instead, as a user with a name, set via your
- httpd.conf file.
- <note>
- <para>
- <quote>nobody</quote>
+ <para>Revisions are normally released to fix security vulnerabilities
+ and are distinguished by an increase in the third number. For example,
+ when 2.16.6 was released, it was a revision to 2.16.5.
+ </para>
- is a real user on UNIX systems. Having a process run as user id
- <quote>nobody</quote>
+ <para>Point releases are normally released when the Bugzilla team feels
+ that there has been a significant amount of progress made between the
+ last point release and the current time. These are often proceeded by a
+ stabilization period and release candidates, however the use of
+ development versions or release candidates is beyond the scope of this
+ document. Point releases can be distinguished by an increase in the
+ second number, or minor version. For example, 2.18.0 is a newer point
+ release than 2.16.5.
+ </para>
- is absolutely no protection against system crackers versus using
- any other user account. As a general security measure, I recommend
- you create unique user ID's for each daemon running on your system
- and, if possible, use "chroot" to jail that process away from the
- rest of your system.</para>
- </note>
- </para>
- </listitem>
+ <para>The examples in this section are written as if you were updating
+ to version 2.18.1. The procedures are the same regardless if you are
+ updating to a new point release or a new revision. However, the chance
+ of running into trouble increases when upgrading to a new point release,
+ escpecially if you've made local changes.
+ </para>
- <listitem>
- <para>Ensure you have adequate access controls for the
- $BUGZILLA_HOME/data/ and $BUGZILLA_HOME/shadow/ directories, as well
- as the $BUGZILLA_HOME/localconfig and $BUGZILLA_HOME/globals.pl
- files. The localconfig file stores your "bugs" user password, which
- would be terrible to have in the hands of a criminal, while the
- "globals.pl" stores some default information regarding your
- installation which could aid a system cracker. In addition, some
- files under $BUGZILLA_HOME/data/ store sensitive information, and
- $BUGZILLA_HOME/shadow/ stores bug information for faster retrieval.
- If you fail to secure these directories and this file, you will
- expose bug information to those who may not be allowed to see
- it.</para>
+ <para>These examples also assume that your Bugzilla installation is at
+ <filename>/var/www/html/bugzilla</filename>. If that is not the case,
+ simply substitute the proper paths where appropriate.
+ </para>
- <note>
- <para>Bugzilla provides default .htaccess files to protect the most
- common Apache installations. However, you should verify these are
- adequate according to the site-wide security policy of your web
- server, and ensure that the .htaccess files are allowed to
- "override" default permissions set in your Apache configuration
- files. Covering Apache security is beyond the scope of this Guide;
- please consult the Apache documentation for details.</para>
-
- <para>If you are using a web server that does not support the
- .htaccess control method,
- <emphasis>you are at risk!</emphasis>
-
- After installing, check to see if you can view the file
- "localconfig" in your web browser (e.g.:
- <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/localconfig">
- http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/localconfig</ulink>
-
- ). If you can read the contents of this file, your web server has
- not secured your bugzilla directory properly and you must fix this
- problem before deploying Bugzilla. If, however, it gives you a
- "Forbidden" error, then it probably respects the .htaccess
- conventions and you are good to go.</para>
- </note>
+ <example id="upgrade-cvs">
+ <title>Upgrading using CVS</title>
- <para>When you run checksetup.pl, the script will attempt to modify
- various permissions on files which Bugzilla uses. If you do not have
- a webservergroup set in the localconfig file, then Bugzilla will have
- to make certain files world readable and/or writable.
- <emphasis>THIS IS INSECURE!</emphasis>
+ <para>Every release of Bugzilla, whether it is a revision or a point
+ release, is tagged in CVS. Also, every tarball we have distributed
+ since version 2.12 has been primed for using CVS. This does, however,
+ require that you are able to access cvs-mirror.mozilla.org on port
+ 2401.
- . This means that anyone who can get access to your system can do
- whatever they want to your Bugzilla installation.</para>
+ <tip>
+ <para>If you can do this, updating using CVS is probably the most
+ painless method, especially if you have a lot of local changes.
+ </para>
+ </tip>
+ </para>
+
+ <programlisting>
+bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html/bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>cvs login</command>
+Logging in to :pserver:anonymous@cvs-mirror.mozilla.org:2401/cvsroot
+CVS password: <command>anonymous</command>
+bash$ <command>cvs -q update -r BUGZILLA-2_18_1 -dP</command>
+P checksetup.pl
+P collectstats.pl
+P globals.pl
+P docs/rel_notes.txt
+P template/en/default/list/quips.html.tmpl
+ </programlisting>
+
+ <para>
+ <caution>
+ <para>If a line in the output from <command>cvs update</command>
+ begins with a <computeroutput>C</computeroutput> that represents a
+ file with local changes that CVS was unable to properly merge. You
+ need to resolve these conflicts manually before Bugzilla (or at
+ least the portion using that file) will be usable.
+ </para>
+ </caution>
<note>
- <para>This also means that if your webserver runs all cgi scripts
- as the same user/group, anyone on the system who can run cgi
- scripts will be able to take control of your Bugzilla
- installation.</para>
+ <para>You also need to run <command>./checksetup.pl</command>
+ before your Bugzilla upgrade will be complete.
+ </para>
</note>
+ </para>
+ </example>
- <para>On Apache, you can use .htaccess files to protect access to
- these directories, as outlined in
- <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57161">Bug
- 57161</ulink>
+ <example id="upgrade-tarball">
+ <title>Upgrading using the tarball</title>
- for the localconfig file, and
- <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65572">Bug
- 65572</ulink>
+ <para>If you are unable or unwilling to use CVS, another option that's
+ always available is to download the latest tarball. This is the most
+ difficult option to use, especially if you have local changes.
+ </para>
- for adequate protection in your data/ and shadow/ directories.</para>
+ <programlisting>
+bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html</command>
+bash$ <command>wget ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla-2.18.1.tar.gz</command>
+<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
+bash$ <command>tar xzvf bugzilla-2.18.1.tar.gz</command>
+bugzilla-2.18.1/
+bugzilla-2.18.1/.cvsignore
+bugzilla-2.18.1/1x1.gif
+<emphasis>Output truncated</emphasis>
+bash$ <command>cd bugzilla-2.18.1</command>
+bash$ <command>cp ../bugzilla/localconfig* .</command>
+bash$ <command>cp -r ../bugzilla/data .</command>
+bash$ <command>cd ..</command>
+bash$ <command>mv bugzilla bugzilla.old</command>
+bash$ <command>mv bugzilla-2.18.1 bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>cd bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>./checksetup.pl</command>
+<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
+ </programlisting>
- <para>Note the instructions which follow are Apache-specific. If you
- use IIS, Netscape, or other non-Apache web servers, please consult
- your system documentation for how to secure these files from being
- transmitted to curious users.</para>
+ <para>
+ <warning>
+ <para>The <command>cp</command> commands both end with periods which
+ is a very important detail, it tells the shell that the destination
+ directory is the current working directory. Also, the period at the
+ beginning of the <command>./checksetup.pl</command> is important and
+ can not be omitted.
+ </para>
+ </warning>
- <para>Place the following text into a file named ".htaccess",
- readable by your web server, in your $BUGZILLA_HOME/data directory.
- <literallayout>&lt;Files comments&gt; allow from all &lt;/Files&gt;
- deny from all</literallayout>
- </para>
+ <note>
+ <para>You will now have to reapply any changes you have made to your
+ local installation manually.
+ </para>
+ </note>
+ </para>
+ </example>
+
+ <example id="upgrade-patches">
+ <title>Upgrading using patches</title>
+
+ <para>The Bugzilla team will normally make a patch file available for
+ revisions to go from the most recent revision to the new one. You could
+ also read the release notes and grab the patches attached to the
+ mentioned bug, but it is safer to use the released patch file as
+ sometimes patches get changed before they get checked in.
+ It is also theoretically possible to
+ scour the fixed bug list and pick and choose which patches to apply
+ from a point release, but this is not recommended either as what you'll
+ end up with is a hodge podge Bugzilla that isn't really any version.
+ This would also make it more difficult to upgrade in the future.
+ </para>
- <para>Place the following text into a file named ".htaccess",
- readable by your web server, in your $BUGZILLA_HOME/ directory.
- <literallayout>&lt;Files localconfig&gt; deny from all &lt;/Files&gt;
- allow from all</literallayout>
- </para>
+ <programlisting>
+bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html/bugzilla</command>
+bash$ <command>wget ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla-2.18.0-to-2.18.1.diff.gz</command>
+<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
+bash$ <command>gunzip bugzilla-2.18.0-to-2.18.1.diff.gz</command>
+bash$ <command>patch -p1 &lt; bugzilla-2.18.0-to-2.18.1.diff</command>
+patching file checksetup.pl
+patching file collectstats.pl
+patching file globals.pl
+ </programlisting>
+
+ <para>
+ <caution>
+ <para>If you do this, beware that this doesn't change the entires in
+ your <filename id="dir">CVS</filename> directory so it may make
+ updates using CVS (<xref linkend="upgrade-cvs"/>) more difficult in the
+ future.
+ </para>
+ </caution>
+ </para>
+ </example>
- <para>Place the following text into a file named ".htaccess",
- readable by your web server, in your $BUGZILLA_HOME/shadow directory.
-
- <literallayout>deny from all</literallayout>
- </para>
- </listitem>
- </orderedlist>
- </para>
</section>
</chapter>
@@ -1380,7 +1124,7 @@ sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
sgml-namecase-general:t
sgml-omittag:t
-sgml-parent-document:("Bugzilla-Guide.sgml" "book" "chapter")
+sgml-parent-document:("Bugzilla-Guide.xml" "book" "chapter")
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-tag-region-if-active:t
End: