diff options
author | barnboy%trilobyte.net <> | 2001-08-22 12:44:14 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | barnboy%trilobyte.net <> | 2001-08-22 12:44:14 +0200 |
commit | bf8ac7551058df22dd5eb712631d9e383fc587a5 (patch) | |
tree | 8cf0b9bb7d0755c75266bd30cf7059d556a23703 /docs/html/rhbugzilla.html | |
parent | f210bb460c786a31bc7677f0e547a67880997558 (diff) | |
download | bugzilla-bf8ac7551058df22dd5eb712631d9e383fc587a5.tar.gz bugzilla-bf8ac7551058df22dd5eb712631d9e383fc587a5.tar.xz |
Big checkin of docs to resolve every
known outstanding doc bug! Yay release.
Still many things to fix. Aren't there always?
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/html/rhbugzilla.html')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/html/rhbugzilla.html | 89 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 67 deletions
diff --git a/docs/html/rhbugzilla.html b/docs/html/rhbugzilla.html index 38d67d26d..c0412cced 100644 --- a/docs/html/rhbugzilla.html +++ b/docs/html/rhbugzilla.html @@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ REL="HOME" TITLE="The Bugzilla Guide" HREF="index.html"><LINK REL="UP" -TITLE="Bugzilla Variants" +TITLE="Bugzilla Variants and Competitors" HREF="variants.html"><LINK REL="PREVIOUS" -TITLE="Bugzilla Variants" +TITLE="Bugzilla Variants and Competitors" HREF="variants.html"><LINK REL="NEXT" -TITLE="Useful Patches and Utilities for Bugzilla" -HREF="patches.html"></HEAD +TITLE="Loki Bugzilla (Fenris)" +HREF="variant_fenris.html"></HEAD ><BODY CLASS="SECTION" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ HREF="variants.html" WIDTH="80%" ALIGN="center" VALIGN="bottom" ->Chapter 7. Bugzilla Variants</TD +>Chapter 7. Bugzilla Variants and Competitors</TD ><TD WIDTH="10%" ALIGN="right" VALIGN="bottom" ><A -HREF="patches.html" +HREF="variant_fenris.html" >Next</A ></TD ></TR @@ -74,65 +74,20 @@ NAME="RHBUGZILLA" >7.1. Red Hat Bugzilla</A ></H1 ><P -> Red Hat Bugzilla is probably the most popular Bugzilla variant, aside from Mozilla Bugzilla, - on the planet. - One of the major benefits of Red Hat Bugzilla is the ability to work with Oracle as a - database, as well as MySQL. - Here's what Dave Lawrence had to say about the status of Red Hat Bugzilla, - <A -NAME="AEN2143" -></A -><BLOCKQUOTE -CLASS="BLOCKQUOTE" -><P -CLASS="LITERALLAYOUT" -> Hello. I apologize that I am getting back to you so late. It has been difficult to keep<br> -up with email this past week. I have checked out your updated documentation and I will<br> -have to say very good work. A few notes and additions as follows.<br> -<br> -(ed: from the FAQ)<br> ->For the record, we are not using any template type implementation for the cosmetic changes <br> ->maded to Bugzilla. It is just alot of html changes in the code itself. I admit I may have <br> ->gotten a little carried away with it but the corporate types asked for a more standardized <br> ->interface to match up with other projects relating to Red Hat web sites. A lot of other web <br> ->based internal tools I am working on also look like Bugzilla. <br> -<br> -<br> -This should probably be changed since we are now in fact using Text::Template for most<br> -of the html rendering. You actually state this later in your numbered list.<br> -<br> -Also number 6 contradicts number 8 where number 6 would be the most up to date status<br> -on the Oracle port.<br> -<br> -Additional Information:<br> ------------------------------<br> -1. Comments are now stored in varchar fields of 4k in size each. If the comment is more<br> -than 4k it is broken up into chunks and given a sort number so each comment can be re<br> -assembled in the correct order. This was done because originally I was storing the comments<br> -in a long datatype which unfortunately cannot be indexed or joined with another table. This<br> -cause the search of text within the long description to be disabled for a long time. That<br> -is now working and is nto showing any noticeble performance hit that I can tell. <br> -<br> -2. Work is being started on internationalizing the Bugzilla source we have to allow our<br> -Japanese customers to enter bug reports into a single bugzilla system. This will probably<br> -be done by using the nvarchar data types supported by Oracle which allows storage of<br> -double byte characters and also the use of the Accept-Language in the http header for <br> -detection by Bugilla of which language to render.<br> -<br> -3. Of course even more cosmetic changes. It is difficult to keep up with the ever <br> -changing faces of www.redhat.com.<br> -<br> -4. Some convenience enhancements in the administration utilities. And more integration<br> -with other internal/external Red Hat web sites.<br> -<br> -I hope this information may prove helpful for your documentation. Please contact<br> -me if you have any more question or I can do anything else.<br> -<br> -Regards<br> - </P -></BLOCKQUOTE -> +> Red Hat Bugzilla is probably the most popular Bugzilla variant + on the planet. One of the major benefits of Red Hat Bugzilla is + the ability to work with Oracle, MySQL, and PostGreSQL databases + serving as the back-end, instead of just MySQL. Dave Lawrence + has worked very hard to keep Red Hat Bugzilla up-to-date, and + many people prefer the snappier-looking page layout of Red Hat + Bugzilla to the default Mozilla-standard formatting. </P +><P +>URL: <A +HREF="http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/" +TARGET="_top" +>http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/</A +></P ></DIV ><DIV CLASS="NAVFOOTER" @@ -165,7 +120,7 @@ WIDTH="33%" ALIGN="right" VALIGN="top" ><A -HREF="patches.html" +HREF="variant_fenris.html" >Next</A ></TD ></TR @@ -174,7 +129,7 @@ HREF="patches.html" WIDTH="33%" ALIGN="left" VALIGN="top" ->Bugzilla Variants</TD +>Bugzilla Variants and Competitors</TD ><TD WIDTH="34%" ALIGN="center" @@ -187,7 +142,7 @@ HREF="variants.html" WIDTH="33%" ALIGN="right" VALIGN="top" ->Useful Patches and Utilities for Bugzilla</TD +>Loki Bugzilla (Fenris)</TD ></TR ></TABLE ></DIV |