summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormbarnson%sisna.com <>2008-04-04 13:46:12 +0200
committermbarnson%sisna.com <>2008-04-04 13:46:12 +0200
commitadc546d5f36c665ea0acc9d69827178da5bc2600 (patch)
treee330815396521f6b97476bbed3e405676388a54a /docs
parentaa7f3f31c61deaabbf53af785ebc57bcc6470986 (diff)
downloadbugzilla-adc546d5f36c665ea0acc9d69827178da5bc2600.tar.gz
bugzilla-adc546d5f36c665ea0acc9d69827178da5bc2600.tar.xz
Added notes on using OpenLDAP;
We should probably look at code changes to make Net::LDAP our permanent LDAP plugin rather than Mozilla::LDAP... See bug 167379.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r--docs/en/xml/installation.xml22
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/en/xml/installation.xml b/docs/en/xml/installation.xml
index d2a111395..76b3eb87a 100644
--- a/docs/en/xml/installation.xml
+++ b/docs/en/xml/installation.xml
@@ -1093,6 +1093,28 @@
primary email address. On most directory servers available, this is
"mail", but you may need to change this.
</para>
+
+ <para>You can also try using <ulink url="http://www.openldap.org/">
+ OpenLDAP</ulink> with Bugzilla, using any of a number of administration
+ tools. You should apply the patch attached this bug:
+ <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158630">
+ http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158630</ulink>, then set
+ the following object classes for your users:
+
+ <orderedlist>
+ <listitem><para>objectClass: person</para></listitem>
+ <listitem><para>objectClass: organizationalPerson</para></listitem>
+ <listitem><para>objectClass: inetOrgPerson</para></listitem>
+ <listitem><para>objectClass: top</para></listitem>
+ <listitem><para>objectClass: posixAccount</para></listitem>
+ <listitem><para>objectClass: shadowAccount</para></listitem>
+ </orderedlist>
+
+ Please note that this patch <emphasis>has not</emphasis> yet been
+ accepted by the Bugzilla team, and so you may need to do some
+ manual tweaking. That said, it looks like Net::LDAP is probably
+ the way to go in the future.
+ </para>
</section>
<section id="content-type"