bugzilla - Bugzilla

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2004-09-03	Patch for bug 257106: Make testing suite know about new directory levels in ↵	jocuri%softhome.net	1	-1/+2
	Bugzilla/Auth; patch by Marc Schumann <wurblzap@gmail.com>; r=vladd, a=myk.
2004-07-21	Bug 241900: Allow Bugzilla::Auth to have multiple login and validation styles	bugreport%peshkin.net	1	-1/+1
	patch by erik r=joel, kiko a=myk
2004-07-12	Backing out bug 241900	bugreport%peshkin.net	1	-1/+1

2004-07-12	Bug 241900: Allow Bugzilla::Auth to have multiple login and validation styles	bugreport%peshkin.net	1	-1/+1
	patch by erik r=joel a=justdave
2004-01-13	Bug 216523: t/Support/Files.pm fails to include ↵	jocuri%softhome.net	1	-1/+2
	Bugzilla/Template/Plugin/Bugzilla.pm in the file list; patch by zach@zachlipton.com; r=jouni; a=justdave.
2004-01-12	Fix for bug 229658: Implements a mechanism for extensions to hook into ↵	myk%mozilla.org	1	-0/+2
	standard Bugzilla templates so they can extend the Bugzilla UI without having to modify the standard templates themselves, making it easier to develop and use Bugzilla extensions. r=bbaetz, gerv a=myk
2003-03-22	Bug 180642 - Move authentication code into a module	bbaetz%acm.org	1	-2/+3
	r=gerv, justdave a=justdave
2003-02-10	Partial fix for bug 192513 (processmail cleanup). Patch fixes test files	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-1/+1
	to disregard processmail since it no longer exists (it was special-cased before). r=dave, a=dave
2003-01-24	Bug 126955 - Bugzilla should support translated/localized templates. Patch ↵	gerv%gerv.net	1	-9/+62
	by burnus; r=gerv, a=justdave.
2002-12-10	Fix for bug 180955: Remove dual-license from test files	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-13/+1
	Permission to do so granted by: justdave, joel, jake, ddk, gerv, bbaetz, and myself (as gleamed from bonsai and the contributors lines and indicated in the bug report). a=justdave.
2002-08-27	Updating my e-mail address as jake@acutex.net is no longer valid.	jake%bugzilla.org	1	-1/+1
	* NO CODE CHANGES *
2002-08-26	Bug 76923 - Don't \|use diagnostics\| (its really expensive at startup time)	bbaetz%student.usyd.edu.au	1	-1/+0
	r=joel x2
2002-08-26	Bug 163494 - runtests.sh needs a switch to include optional modules	bugreport%peshkin.net	1	-16/+38
	Tests now detect optional modules and only exclude optional files if optional module dependencies are not met. Also major indent cleanup r=timeless
2002-08-14	Bug 162438 - fix permissions/tests for Bugzilla/ directory	bbaetz%student.usyd.edu.au	1	-1/+2
	r=joel x2
2002-05-07	Bug 135543 - @Support::Templates::testitems does not list all templates	bbaetz%student.usyd.edu.au	1	-9/+50
	Patch by ddkilzer@theracingworld.com (David D. Kilzer), r=gerv, justdave
2002-04-24	Fix tinderbox bustage caused by the template location code change. The ↵	justdave%syndicomm.com	1	-1/+1
	tests are now looking in the right place for the templates. 4 templates in the new location now come up with syntax errors however.
2002-03-12	Bug 130254 - Template params don't have to exist, since they may be	bbaetz%student.usyd.edu.au	1	-0/+3
	subject to interpolation. Ignore names with $ in them as a workaround r=myk x 2
2001-12-01	Get the file list of files to scan for templates from Support::Files instead ↵	jake%acutex.net	1	-1/+3
	of glob('*')
2001-11-14	We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE ↵	jake%acutex.net	1	-15/+0
	%] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.
2001-10-31	Have the tests test .pm files as well, yes this creates bustage, this is	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-1/+1
	intentional! No review needed for tests at this time.
2001-10-20	Bug 103664 - Tests should "use strict;" and not contain any tabs. We should ↵	jake%acutex.net	3	-9/+12
	also use the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable instead of VERBOSE. Patch by David D. Kilzer <ddkilzer@theracingworld.com> Additional edits by myself to add the emacs mode line. Also, the change to runtests.sh was done by me.
2001-10-10	It's also possible to PROCESS another attachment fragment, not just INCLUDE.	jake%acutex.net	1	-1/+1
	No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD.
2001-10-07	Allow compile tests for files that run in taint mode	jake%acutex.net	1	-2/+2
	No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD
2001-10-07	We also need to look for templates that are INCLUDEd in other templates.	jake%acutex.net	1	-0/+17
	No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD
2001-10-07	Test that scans Bugzilla's code looking for used templates then checks to ↵	jake%acutex.net	1	-0/+44
	make sure that: a) All the required templates exist b) They all have good syntax No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD
2001-10-06	Fixing issue where excluded files aren't excluded if they end in .pl or	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-4/+5
	.cgi.
2001-10-06	Don't test importxml.pl since you need XML::Parser which is not required,	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-1/+1
	creating a false fail. No review needed for tests. NOT PART OF BUILD
2001-09-17	Fix to make the tests generate the list of files to test instead of having ↵	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-53/+28
	to update the list manually whenever a file is added or removed. The main logic is in t/Support/Files.pm, changes to the test files are needed to allow it to function properly. NOT_PART_OF_BUILD. No review needed for tests at this time.
2001-09-10	Oops. Forgot to check this is.	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-0/+12

2001-09-04	Add a little 1; to the end of this.	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-0/+2

2001-09-04	Remove processmail from the list. It was causing problems with taint.	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-4/+3

2001-09-04	Addition of Files.pm which will be used shortly by 1.t (soon to be ↵	zach%zachlipton.com	1	-0/+89
	1compile.t) which contains the list of files to test. This is important so that we can bring it into other tests which check files for content, etc... No review required for tests as of now as per Dave.