diff options
author | Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net> | 2009-08-11 14:05:13 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | James Rayner <james@archlinux.org> | 2009-08-15 04:28:30 +0200 |
commit | e27d094577f874613c49cc3d93796162230ca2c8 (patch) | |
tree | fbd7cb78b7c6d11b6d12febce6a9f99581a64a67 | |
parent | 2282776f1dd928b6c5f56e30cbf2c52a4f26303d (diff) | |
download | netctl-e27d094577f874613c49cc3d93796162230ca2c8.tar.gz netctl-e27d094577f874613c49cc3d93796162230ca2c8.tar.xz |
start consolidation of ifconfig/ip/set_interface
* try to factor all the ifconfig/ip set dev code to single location
(currently networks/set_interface, though I recommend a different name
for this function because it's too close in name and different
in functionality from set_iface, set_profile).
* added "forcedown" option to set_interface, meaning "just go down
don't worry about 'nodown' quirks"
* even with "forcedown", this factoring would introduce "ip addr
flush dev $INTERFACE" calls to existing code. I assume that's
harmless? or even beneficial?
* one code block (in ethernet_iproute) had stdout,stderr of the
down calls redirected to /dev/null. I've moved that to
set_interface, so now everyone's getting that behavior. I assume
that's appropriate...
* now no more calls to "ip" or "ifconfig" outside of set_interface,
except the checks for NO-CARRIER after ethernet*/set_interface up.
They might also be moved to network/set_interface?
* as of this commit, all the set_interface calls are now using ip
instead of ifconfig. A subsequent commit will isolate the ip-use
to ethernet-iproute and the ifconfig-use to ethernet.
* ALERT: attend to wireless_down, it seems to be calling
set_interface down twice (once in ethernet_down, once in itself).
And neither this commit nor the code it's patching respects
quirk nodown in the ethernet_down block.
Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>
-rw-r--r-- | src/connections/ethernet | 14 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/connections/ethernet-iproute | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/connections/wireless | 17 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/network | 16 |
4 files changed, 42 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/src/connections/ethernet b/src/connections/ethernet index 935bf8b..64a8513 100644 --- a/src/connections/ethernet +++ b/src/connections/ethernet @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ethernet_up() { fi report_debug ethernet_up ifup - set_interface up $INTERFACE + set_interface up "$INTERFACE" if ip link show $INTERFACE| fgrep -q "NO-CARRIER"; then report_fail "No connection" @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ ethernet_up() { return 1 fi if ! wpa_check "$INTERFACE"; then - ifconfig "$INTERFACE" down + # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? + # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? + set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" report_fail "WPA Authentication/Association Failed" return 1 fi @@ -73,6 +75,10 @@ ethernet_up() { if [[ -n "$GATEWAY" ]]; then report_debug ethernet_up route add default gw "$GATEWAY" if ! route add default gw $GATEWAY; then + # JP: don't we want to add this to all the aborts? + # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? + # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? + set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" report_fail "Adding gateway $GATEWAY failed." return 1 fi @@ -136,7 +142,9 @@ ethernet_down() { esac report_debug ethernet_down ifdown - set_interface down $INTERFACE + # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? + # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? + set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" } # Returns status of profile - is it still functional? diff --git a/src/connections/ethernet-iproute b/src/connections/ethernet-iproute index 046b9a0..c50fd7d 100644 --- a/src/connections/ethernet-iproute +++ b/src/connections/ethernet-iproute @@ -4,8 +4,7 @@ report_iproute() { report_fail "$*" - ip addr flush $INTERFACE &>/dev/null - quirk "nodown" || ip link set $INTERFACE down &>/dev/null + set_interface down "$INTERFACE" exit 1 } @@ -19,9 +18,9 @@ ethernet_up() { fi report_debug ethernet_iproute_up ifup - set_interface up $INTERFACE + set_interface up "$INTERFACE" - if ip link show $INTERFACE | fgrep -q "NO-CARRIER"; then + if ip link show dev "$INTERFACE" | fgrep -q "NO-CARRIER"; then report_iproute "No connection" fi @@ -37,7 +36,9 @@ ethernet_up() { fi if ! wpa_check "$INTERFACE"; then - ip link set $INTERFACE down + # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? or should we just use report_iproute? + # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? + set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" report_fail "WPA Authentication/Association Failed" return 1 fi @@ -120,7 +121,9 @@ ethernet_down() { fi report_debug ethernet_iproute_down if_down - set_interface down $INTERFACE + # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? + # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? + set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" } diff --git a/src/connections/wireless b/src/connections/wireless index 430f0ab..fffd048 100644 --- a/src/connections/wireless +++ b/src/connections/wireless @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ wireless_up() { fi report_debug wireless_up ifup - set_interface up $INTERFACE || return 1 + set_interface up "$INTERFACE" || return 1 ## wireless_control "$INTERFACE" up || return 1 quirk prescan && iwlist "$INTERFACE" scan &> /dev/null # bcm43xx @@ -107,7 +107,11 @@ wireless_up() { fi fi - quirk "predown" && ifconfig $INTERFACE down # madwifi FS#10585 + if quirk "predown"; then # madwifi FS#10585 + # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? + # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? + set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" + fi report_debug wireless_up iwconfig "$INTERFACE" $WEP_OPTS if ! eval iwconfig $INTERFACE $WEP_OPTS; then @@ -115,7 +119,9 @@ wireless_up() { return 1 fi - quirk "predown" && ifconfig $INTERFACE up # madwifi FS#10585 + if quirk "predown"; then # madwifi FS#10585 + set_interface up "$INTERFACE" + fi report_debug ethernet_up wep_check if ! wep_check $INTERFACE $TIMEOUT; then @@ -202,7 +208,10 @@ wireless_down() { [[ "$SECURITY" == "wpa" ]] && rm -rf "/tmp/wpa.${PROFILE// /}" # remove tmp wpa config report_debug wireless_down iwconfig "$INTERFACE" essid off key off iwconfig $INTERFACE essid off key off &> /dev/null - set_interface down $INTERFACE + # respects quirk nodown---is that appropriate? + # wasn't this already called in ethernet_down? but does the call there respect quirk nodown? + # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? + set_interface down "$INTERFACE" # If rfkill is specified, disable device. if [[ -n "$RFKILL_NAME" ]]; then diff --git a/src/network b/src/network index ae74837..d65c899 100644 --- a/src/network +++ b/src/network @@ -336,17 +336,19 @@ set_iface() { set_interface() { - INTERFACE=$2 - case $1 in + INTERFACE="$2" + case "$1" in up) at_interface_up - ip link set dev $INTERFACE up - sleep ${UP_SLEEP:-2} + ip link set dev "$INTERFACE" up + sleep "${UP_SLEEP:-2}" ;; - down) + down|forcedown) at_interface_down - ip addr flush dev "$INTERFACE" - quirk nodown || ip link set dev "$INTERFACE" down + ip addr flush dev "$INTERFACE" &>/dev/null + if ! quirk nodown || [ "$1" = forcedown ]; then + ip link set dev "$INTERFACE" down &>/dev/null + fi ;; *) return 1 |