diff options
author | Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net> | 2009-09-14 05:43:48 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | James Rayner <james@archlinux.org> | 2009-09-14 08:27:36 +0200 |
commit | 57bed3df9310db328d80b32b31fdefa8418bbd1e (patch) | |
tree | 29a1b3e4e3a0a2ea886cc12353869aad5f5eb34c /src | |
parent | a02e1e0dea5172d6eb55b8e99428b5ad386d3d66 (diff) | |
download | netctl-57bed3df9310db328d80b32b31fdefa8418bbd1e.tar.gz netctl-57bed3df9310db328d80b32b31fdefa8418bbd1e.tar.xz |
Rename set_interface to bring_interface
3. Change the name of "set_interface up/down..." to "bring_interface
up/down" to differentiate it from the similarly-named, merely record-keeping functions.
Signed-off-by: Jim Pryor <profjim@jimpryor.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/connections/ethernet | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/connections/ethernet-iproute | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/connections/wireless | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/network | 2 |
4 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/src/connections/ethernet b/src/connections/ethernet index 8e34327..e24cc3e 100644 --- a/src/connections/ethernet +++ b/src/connections/ethernet @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ethernet_up() { fi report_debug ethernet_up ifup - set_interface up-old "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface up-old "$INTERFACE" # don't think it's possible to detect carrier using ifconfig alone (at least, not without ifdown/ifupping the interface) if [[ $(cat "/sys/class/net/$INTERFACE/carrier" 2>/dev/null) -ne 1 ]]; then # gives err if iface inactive (i.e. ifdown) @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ ethernet_up() { if ! wpa_check "$INTERFACE"; then # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? - set_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" report_fail "WPA Authentication/Association Failed" return 1 fi @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ ethernet_up() { # JP: don't we want to add this to all the aborts? # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? - set_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" report_fail "Adding gateway $GATEWAY failed." return 1 fi @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ ethernet_down() { report_debug ethernet_down ifdown # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? - set_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" } # Returns status of profile - is it still functional? diff --git a/src/connections/ethernet-iproute b/src/connections/ethernet-iproute index 9da4b37..088d25b 100644 --- a/src/connections/ethernet-iproute +++ b/src/connections/ethernet-iproute @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ report_iproute() { report_fail "$*" - set_interface down "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface down "$INTERFACE" exit 1 } @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ ethernet_up() { fi report_debug ethernet_iproute_up ifup - set_interface up "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface up "$INTERFACE" if ip link show dev "$INTERFACE" | fgrep -q "NO-CARRIER"; then @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ ethernet_up() { if ! wpa_check "$INTERFACE"; then # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? or should we just use report_iproute? # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? - set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" report_fail "WPA Authentication/Association Failed" return 1 fi @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ ethernet_down() { report_debug ethernet_iproute_down if_down # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? - set_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface forcedown "$INTERFACE" } diff --git a/src/connections/wireless b/src/connections/wireless index 42504d2..e1d4a44 100644 --- a/src/connections/wireless +++ b/src/connections/wireless @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ wireless_up() { fi report_debug wireless_up ifup - set_interface up-old "$INTERFACE" || return 1 + bring_interface up-old "$INTERFACE" || return 1 quirk prescan && iwlist "$INTERFACE" scan &> /dev/null # bcm43xx if quirk preessid; then # ipw3945 @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ wireless_up() { if quirk "predown"; then # madwifi FS#10585 # ignore quirk nodown---is that appropriate? # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? - set_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface forcedown-old "$INTERFACE" fi report_debug wireless_up iwconfig "$INTERFACE" $WEP_OPTS @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ wireless_up() { fi if quirk "predown"; then # madwifi FS#10585 - set_interface up-old "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface up-old "$INTERFACE" fi report_debug ethernet_up wep_check @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ wireless_down() { # respects quirk nodown---is that appropriate? # wasn't this already called in ethernet_down? but does the call there respect quirk nodown? # this adds a flush call as well---is that appropriate? - set_interface down-old "$INTERFACE" + bring_interface down-old "$INTERFACE" # Handle wireless kill switches # Any reason why a hardware switch should be considered on interface down? diff --git a/src/network b/src/network index ba37847..165d6e3 100644 --- a/src/network +++ b/src/network @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ set_iface() { fi } -set_interface() +bring_interface() { INTERFACE="$2" case "$1" in |