summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/libalpm/conflict.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>2008-05-13 03:49:18 +0200
committerDan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>2008-05-13 22:49:02 +0200
commit584ffa6aef13d0933ad4930ab9cb70d3af2977ff (patch)
tree842b275a7898bafb1394829a1913960a548caefe /lib/libalpm/conflict.c
parentd5278ebb3ba94efdc9fffb7924ac66b6747d9011 (diff)
downloadpacman-584ffa6aef13d0933ad4930ab9cb70d3af2977ff.tar.gz
pacman-584ffa6aef13d0933ad4930ab9cb70d3af2977ff.tar.xz
Remove an outdated exception check in file conflict code
This has been around since at least pacman 2.9.8. Frugalware just dumped it in commit 113ec73bfcfdc, and deleting it here and running pactest shows that nothing that we have actually tested changes. If someone can pactest the edge case where this is needed, then show me the money. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/libalpm/conflict.c')
-rw-r--r--lib/libalpm/conflict.c20
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/conflict.c b/lib/libalpm/conflict.c
index 68665e78..a8bcdd59 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/conflict.c
+++ b/lib/libalpm/conflict.c
@@ -447,26 +447,6 @@ alpm_list_t *_alpm_db_find_fileconflicts(pmdb_t *db, pmtrans_t *trans, char *roo
if(!skip_conflict) {
_alpm_log(PM_LOG_DEBUG, "checking possible conflict: %s\n", path);
- /* Make sure the possible conflict is not a symlink that points to a
- * path in the old package. This is kind of dirty with inode usage */
- /* TODO this seems ripe for a cleanup */
- if(dbpkg) {
- struct stat pkgbuf;
- char str[PATH_MAX+1];
- unsigned ok = 0;
- for(k = dbpkg->files; k; k = k->next) {
- snprintf(str, PATH_MAX, "%s%s", root, (char*)k->data);
- if(!_alpm_lstat(str, &pkgbuf) && lsbuf.st_ino == pkgbuf.st_ino) {
- ok = 1;
- _alpm_log(PM_LOG_DEBUG, "conflict was a symlink: %s\n", path);
- break;
- }
- }
- if(ok == 1) {
- continue;
- }
- }
-
/* Look at all the targets to see if file has changed hands */
int resolved_conflict = 0; /* have we acted on this conflict? */
for(k = targets; k; k = k->next) {